VRA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of -15.89% compared to Vera Bradley's net margin of -5.96%. Vera Bradley's return on equity of -6.91% beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of -9.56%.

Vera Bradley has a consensus price target of $6.25, signalling upside risk potential of 73.61%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 36.1%. Given that Vera Bradley has higher upside potential than Bassett Furniture Industries, analysts believe Vera Bradley is more attractive than Bassett Furniture Industries.

Vera Bradley has a beta of 1.968, which suggesting that the stock is 96.826% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.692, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.196%.

Vera Bradley has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 5.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Vera Bradley pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -188.65% of its earnings as a dividend.

Vera Bradley quarterly revenues are $80.6M, which are larger than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $75.6M. Vera Bradley's net income of -$12.8M is lower than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of -$4.5M. Notably, Vera Bradley's price-to-earnings ratio is 194.33x while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vera Bradley is 0.27x versus 0.36x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a net margin of -15.89% compared to Vera Bradley's net margin of 5.54%. Vera Bradley's return on equity of -6.91% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of 20.22%.

Vera Bradley has a consensus price target of $6.25, signalling upside risk potential of 73.61%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group has an analysts' consensus of $6.33 which suggests that it could grow by 191.86%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than Vera Bradley, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than Vera Bradley.

Vera Bradley has a beta of 1.968, which suggesting that the stock is 96.826% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 2.383, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 138.268%.

Vera Bradley has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commercial Vehicle Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vera Bradley pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vera Bradley quarterly revenues are $80.6M, which are smaller than Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues of $171.8M. Vera Bradley's net income of -$12.8M is lower than Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of $9.5M. Notably, Vera Bradley's price-to-earnings ratio is 194.33x while Commercial Vehicle Group's PE ratio is 2.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vera Bradley is 0.27x versus 0.07x for Commercial Vehicle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -15.89% compared to Vera Bradley's net margin of --. Vera Bradley's return on equity of -6.91% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Vera Bradley has a consensus price target of $6.25, signalling upside risk potential of 73.61%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -16.32%. Given that Vera Bradley has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Vera Bradley is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Vera Bradley has a beta of 1.968, which suggesting that the stock is 96.826% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.097, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.703%.

Vera Bradley has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vera Bradley pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vera Bradley quarterly revenues are $80.6M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Vera Bradley's net income of -$12.8M is lower than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Vera Bradley's price-to-earnings ratio is 194.33x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vera Bradley is 0.27x versus 239.69x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of -15.89% compared to Vera Bradley's net margin of --. Vera Bradley's return on equity of -6.91% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

Vera Bradley has a consensus price target of $6.25, signalling upside risk potential of 73.61%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Vera Bradley has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Vera Bradley is more attractive than Northann.

Vera Bradley has a beta of 1.968, which suggesting that the stock is 96.826% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vera Bradley has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vera Bradley pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vera Bradley quarterly revenues are $80.6M, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. Vera Bradley's net income of -$12.8M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, Vera Bradley's price-to-earnings ratio is 194.33x while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vera Bradley is 0.27x versus 0.51x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.