TEAM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Asana has a net margin of -10.42% compared to Atlassian's net margin of -31.18%. Atlassian's return on equity of -40.24% beat Asana's return on equity of -84.67%.

Atlassian has a consensus price target of $275.98, signalling upside risk potential of 7.18%. On the other hand Asana has an analysts' consensus of $16.63 which suggests that it could fall by -13.81%. Given that Atlassian has higher upside potential than Asana, analysts believe Atlassian is more attractive than Asana.

Atlassian has a beta of 0.804, which suggesting that the stock is 19.607% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Asana has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Atlassian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Asana offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Atlassian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Asana pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Atlassian quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Asana quarterly revenues of $183.9M. Atlassian's net income of -$123.8M is lower than Asana's net income of -$57.3M. Notably, Atlassian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Asana's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atlassian is 14.67x versus 7.08x for Asana. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of -10.42% compared to Atlassian's net margin of 19.59%. Atlassian's return on equity of -40.24% beat Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 27.48%.

Atlassian has a consensus price target of $275.98, signalling upside risk potential of 7.18%. On the other hand Cadence Design Systems has an analysts' consensus of $319.72 which suggests that it could grow by 3.61%. Given that Atlassian has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, analysts believe Atlassian is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems.

Atlassian has a beta of 0.804, which suggesting that the stock is 19.607% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.027, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.746%.

Atlassian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cadence Design Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Atlassian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cadence Design Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Atlassian quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Atlassian's net income of -$123.8M is lower than Cadence Design Systems's net income of $238.1M. Notably, Atlassian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cadence Design Systems's PE ratio is 80.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atlassian is 14.67x versus 19.37x for Cadence Design Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of -10.42% compared to Atlassian's net margin of 37.61%. Atlassian's return on equity of -40.24% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 35.68%.

Atlassian has a consensus price target of $275.98, signalling upside risk potential of 7.18%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $508.55 which suggests that it could grow by 15.76%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Atlassian, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Atlassian.

Atlassian has a beta of 0.804, which suggesting that the stock is 19.607% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.139%.

Atlassian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Atlassian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Atlassian quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $65.6B. Atlassian's net income of -$123.8M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.7B. Notably, Atlassian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 36.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atlassian is 14.67x versus 12.91x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smartsheet has a net margin of -10.42% compared to Atlassian's net margin of 0.46%. Atlassian's return on equity of -40.24% beat Smartsheet's return on equity of -1.36%.

Atlassian has a consensus price target of $275.98, signalling upside risk potential of 7.18%. On the other hand Smartsheet has an analysts' consensus of $53.49 which suggests that it could grow by 0.86%. Given that Atlassian has higher upside potential than Smartsheet, analysts believe Atlassian is more attractive than Smartsheet.

Atlassian has a beta of 0.804, which suggesting that the stock is 19.607% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smartsheet has a beta of 0.706, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.444%.

Atlassian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Smartsheet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Atlassian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Smartsheet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Atlassian quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Smartsheet quarterly revenues of $286.9M. Atlassian's net income of -$123.8M is lower than Smartsheet's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Atlassian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Smartsheet's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atlassian is 14.67x versus 7.21x for Smartsheet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.