TANH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Big Tree Cloud Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Tantech Holdings's net margin of --. Tantech Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Big Tree Cloud Holdings's return on equity of --.

Tantech Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Big Tree Cloud Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tantech Holdings has higher upside potential than Big Tree Cloud Holdings, analysts believe Tantech Holdings is more attractive than Big Tree Cloud Holdings.

Tantech Holdings has a beta of 0.311, which suggesting that the stock is 68.861% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Big Tree Cloud Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tantech Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Big Tree Cloud Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tantech Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Big Tree Cloud Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tantech Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Big Tree Cloud Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Tantech Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Big Tree Cloud Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Tantech Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Big Tree Cloud Holdings's PE ratio is 278.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tantech Holdings is 0.01x versus 30.34x for Big Tree Cloud Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Farmmi has a net margin of -- compared to Tantech Holdings's net margin of --. Tantech Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Farmmi's return on equity of 0.98%.

Tantech Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Farmmi has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tantech Holdings has higher upside potential than Farmmi, analysts believe Tantech Holdings is more attractive than Farmmi.

Tantech Holdings has a beta of 0.311, which suggesting that the stock is 68.861% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Farmmi has a beta of 1.227, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.723%.

Tantech Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Farmmi offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tantech Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Farmmi pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tantech Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Farmmi quarterly revenues of --. Tantech Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Farmmi's net income of --. Notably, Tantech Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Farmmi's PE ratio is 1.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tantech Holdings is 0.01x versus 0.03x for Farmmi. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PHH Corporation has a net margin of -- compared to Tantech Holdings's net margin of --. Tantech Holdings's return on equity of -- beat PHH Corporation's return on equity of --.

Tantech Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PHH Corporation has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tantech Holdings has higher upside potential than PHH Corporation, analysts believe Tantech Holdings is more attractive than PHH Corporation.

Tantech Holdings has a beta of 0.311, which suggesting that the stock is 68.861% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PHH Corporation has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tantech Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PHH Corporation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tantech Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PHH Corporation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tantech Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PHH Corporation quarterly revenues of --. Tantech Holdings's net income of -- is lower than PHH Corporation's net income of --. Notably, Tantech Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PHH Corporation's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tantech Holdings is 0.01x versus -- for PHH Corporation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shineco has a net margin of -- compared to Tantech Holdings's net margin of -93.04%. Tantech Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Shineco's return on equity of -65.35%.

Tantech Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Shineco has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tantech Holdings has higher upside potential than Shineco, analysts believe Tantech Holdings is more attractive than Shineco.

Tantech Holdings has a beta of 0.311, which suggesting that the stock is 68.861% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shineco has a beta of -0.272, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 127.2%.

Tantech Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shineco offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tantech Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shineco pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tantech Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Shineco quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Tantech Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Shineco's net income of -$2M. Notably, Tantech Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Shineco's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tantech Holdings is 0.01x versus 0.03x for Shineco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.