Is Revolve Group Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
Recently, Revolve Group (NYSE:RVLV) management delivered some fairly positive business…
Sell
34
SWIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.48
Seasonality move
:
-44.78%
Day range:
$1.45 - $1.52
52-week range:
$1.16 - $43.60
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
8.33x
P/B ratio:
4.06x
Volume:
54K
Avg. volume:
180.4K
1-year change:
-83.83%
Market cap:
$24.4M
Revenue:
$4.3M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.33
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SWIN
Solowin Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $4.00 |
|
ABTS
Abits Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$576.6M | $1.71 | 73.94% | 67.95% | $143.73 |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SWIN
Solowin Holdings
|
$1.48 | $4.00 | $24.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 8.33x |
|
ABTS
Abits Group
|
$1.77 | -- | $4.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.45x |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$80.39 | $143.73 | $11.1B | 16.13x | $2.00 | 0% | 6.46x |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
$1.52 | -- | $58.4M | 11.24x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.84x |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
$1.18 | -- | $4.8M | -- | $0.01 | 0% | 3.62x |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
$1.11 | -- | $41.1M | 61.61x | $0.00 | 0% | 13.53x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SWIN
Solowin Holdings
|
-- | -7.038 | -- | 1.04x |
|
ABTS
Abits Group
|
-- | 0.786 | -- | 0.83x |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
22.81% | 0.350 | 9.66% | 0.67x |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
22.88% | -1.843 | 9.26% | 0.30x |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | 0.895 | -- | 56.19x |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | 0.375 | -- | 3.64x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SWIN
Solowin Holdings
|
-- | -- | -58.97% | -58.97% | -- | -- |
|
ABTS
Abits Group
|
-- | -- | -63.52% | -63.52% | -- | -- |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$470.3M | $285.2M | 16.9% | 20.37% | 50.03% | -- |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
-- | -- | -27.01% | -30.78% | -- | -- |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | -- | -0.43% | -0.43% | -- | -- |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | -- | 2.73% | 2.73% | -- | -- |
Solowin Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SWIN or ABTS?
Abits Group has a net margin of -- compared to Solowin Holdings's net margin of --. Solowin Holdings's return on equity of -58.97% beat Abits Group's return on equity of -63.52%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWINSolowin Holdings-- -- $8.9M ABTSAbits Group-- -- $11.3M -
What do Analysts Say About SWIN or ABTS?
Solowin Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 170.27%. On the other hand Abits Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Solowin Holdings has higher upside potential than Abits Group, analysts believe Solowin Holdings is more attractive than Abits Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWINSolowin Holdings0 0 0 ABTSAbits Group0 0 0 -
Is SWIN or ABTS More Risky?
Solowin Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abits Group has a beta of 2.627, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 162.714%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWIN or ABTS?
Solowin Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Abits Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Solowin Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Abits Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWIN or ABTS?
Solowin Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Abits Group quarterly revenues of --. Solowin Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Abits Group's net income of --. Notably, Solowin Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Abits Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solowin Holdings is 8.33x versus 1.45x for Abits Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWINSolowin Holdings8.33x -- -- -- ABTSAbits Group1.45x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SWIN or FUTU?
Futu Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Solowin Holdings's net margin of 42.23%. Solowin Holdings's return on equity of -58.97% beat Futu Holdings's return on equity of 20.37%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWINSolowin Holdings-- -- $8.9M FUTUFutu Holdings82.49% $1.72 $4.7B -
What do Analysts Say About SWIN or FUTU?
Solowin Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 170.27%. On the other hand Futu Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $143.73 which suggests that it could grow by 78.79%. Given that Solowin Holdings has higher upside potential than Futu Holdings, analysts believe Solowin Holdings is more attractive than Futu Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWINSolowin Holdings0 0 0 FUTUFutu Holdings9 2 0 -
Is SWIN or FUTU More Risky?
Solowin Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Futu Holdings has a beta of 0.673, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.677%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWIN or FUTU?
Solowin Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Futu Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Solowin Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Futu Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWIN or FUTU?
Solowin Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Futu Holdings quarterly revenues of $570.1M. Solowin Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Futu Holdings's net income of $240.7M. Notably, Solowin Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Futu Holdings's PE ratio is 16.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solowin Holdings is 8.33x versus 6.46x for Futu Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWINSolowin Holdings8.33x -- -- -- FUTUFutu Holdings6.46x 16.13x $570.1M $240.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns SWIN or MATH?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a net margin of -- compared to Solowin Holdings's net margin of --. Solowin Holdings's return on equity of -58.97% beat Metalpha Technology Holding's return on equity of -30.78%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWINSolowin Holdings-- -- $8.9M MATHMetalpha Technology Holding-- -- $21.9M -
What do Analysts Say About SWIN or MATH?
Solowin Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 170.27%. On the other hand Metalpha Technology Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Solowin Holdings has higher upside potential than Metalpha Technology Holding, analysts believe Solowin Holdings is more attractive than Metalpha Technology Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWINSolowin Holdings0 0 0 MATHMetalpha Technology Holding0 0 0 -
Is SWIN or MATH More Risky?
Solowin Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metalpha Technology Holding has a beta of -1.171, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 217.074%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWIN or MATH?
Solowin Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Metalpha Technology Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Solowin Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Metalpha Technology Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWIN or MATH?
Solowin Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Metalpha Technology Holding quarterly revenues of --. Solowin Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Metalpha Technology Holding's net income of --. Notably, Solowin Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Metalpha Technology Holding's PE ratio is 11.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solowin Holdings is 8.33x versus 1.84x for Metalpha Technology Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWINSolowin Holdings8.33x -- -- -- MATHMetalpha Technology Holding1.84x 11.24x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SWIN or MEGL?
Magic Empire Global has a net margin of -- compared to Solowin Holdings's net margin of --. Solowin Holdings's return on equity of -58.97% beat Magic Empire Global's return on equity of -0.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWINSolowin Holdings-- -- $8.9M MEGLMagic Empire Global-- -- $17.3M -
What do Analysts Say About SWIN or MEGL?
Solowin Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 170.27%. On the other hand Magic Empire Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Solowin Holdings has higher upside potential than Magic Empire Global, analysts believe Solowin Holdings is more attractive than Magic Empire Global.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWINSolowin Holdings0 0 0 MEGLMagic Empire Global0 0 0 -
Is SWIN or MEGL More Risky?
Solowin Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Empire Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWIN or MEGL?
Solowin Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magic Empire Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Solowin Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Empire Global pays out -326.97% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWIN or MEGL?
Solowin Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Magic Empire Global quarterly revenues of --. Solowin Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Magic Empire Global's net income of --. Notably, Solowin Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Magic Empire Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solowin Holdings is 8.33x versus 3.62x for Magic Empire Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWINSolowin Holdings8.33x -- -- -- MEGLMagic Empire Global3.62x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SWIN or TOP?
TOP Financial Group has a net margin of -- compared to Solowin Holdings's net margin of --. Solowin Holdings's return on equity of -58.97% beat TOP Financial Group's return on equity of 2.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWINSolowin Holdings-- -- $8.9M TOPTOP Financial Group-- -- $40.5M -
What do Analysts Say About SWIN or TOP?
Solowin Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 170.27%. On the other hand TOP Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Solowin Holdings has higher upside potential than TOP Financial Group, analysts believe Solowin Holdings is more attractive than TOP Financial Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWINSolowin Holdings0 0 0 TOPTOP Financial Group0 0 0 -
Is SWIN or TOP More Risky?
Solowin Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOP Financial Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWIN or TOP?
Solowin Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TOP Financial Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Solowin Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TOP Financial Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWIN or TOP?
Solowin Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TOP Financial Group quarterly revenues of --. Solowin Holdings's net income of -- is lower than TOP Financial Group's net income of --. Notably, Solowin Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TOP Financial Group's PE ratio is 61.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solowin Holdings is 8.33x versus 13.53x for TOP Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWINSolowin Holdings8.33x -- -- -- TOPTOP Financial Group13.53x 61.61x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Bloom Energy Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
While already interesting as the world moves toward greener energy…
What Do Tesla Delivery Numbers Mean for Tesla Stock?
Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) released Q1 delivery numbers, showing a substantial slowdown…
Stock Ideas
Sell
45
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Buy
52
RGC alert for Apr 12
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 29.14% over the past day.
Buy
52
SLP alert for Apr 12
Simulations Plus [SLP] is up 26.73% over the past day.
Buy
89
GDXU alert for Apr 12
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 15.9% over the past day.
