SSTI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autodesk has a net margin of -5.49% compared to SoundThinking's net margin of 17.52%. SoundThinking's return on equity of -1.99% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 51.52%.

SoundThinking has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 66.8%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $327.01 which suggests that it could grow by 9.92%. Given that SoundThinking has higher upside potential than Autodesk, analysts believe SoundThinking is more attractive than Autodesk.

SoundThinking has a beta of 1.189, which suggesting that the stock is 18.916% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.432, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.152%.

SoundThinking has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SoundThinking pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SoundThinking quarterly revenues are $26.3M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. SoundThinking's net income of -$1.4M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $275M. Notably, SoundThinking's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Autodesk's PE ratio is 59.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SoundThinking is 1.50x versus 10.82x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Agilysys has a net margin of -5.49% compared to SoundThinking's net margin of 2%. SoundThinking's return on equity of -1.99% beat Agilysys's return on equity of 42.17%.

SoundThinking has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 66.8%. On the other hand Agilysys has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3.5%. Given that SoundThinking has higher upside potential than Agilysys, analysts believe SoundThinking is more attractive than Agilysys.

SoundThinking has a beta of 1.189, which suggesting that the stock is 18.916% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agilysys has a beta of 0.930, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.042%.

SoundThinking has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Agilysys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SoundThinking pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys pays out 1.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SoundThinking quarterly revenues are $26.3M, which are smaller than Agilysys quarterly revenues of $68.3M. SoundThinking's net income of -$1.4M is lower than Agilysys's net income of $1.4M. Notably, SoundThinking's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Agilysys's PE ratio is 38.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SoundThinking is 1.50x versus 14.92x for Agilysys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of -5.49% compared to SoundThinking's net margin of -9.14%. SoundThinking's return on equity of -1.99% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

SoundThinking has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 66.8%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 137.38%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than SoundThinking, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than SoundThinking.

SoundThinking has a beta of 1.189, which suggesting that the stock is 18.916% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 1.201, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.116%.

SoundThinking has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SoundThinking pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SoundThinking quarterly revenues are $26.3M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. SoundThinking's net income of -$1.4M is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, SoundThinking's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SoundThinking is 1.50x versus 0.71x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Issuer Direct has a net margin of -5.49% compared to SoundThinking's net margin of -6.7%. SoundThinking's return on equity of -1.99% beat Issuer Direct's return on equity of -3.74%.

SoundThinking has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 66.8%. On the other hand Issuer Direct has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 47.56%. Given that SoundThinking has higher upside potential than Issuer Direct, analysts believe SoundThinking is more attractive than Issuer Direct.

SoundThinking has a beta of 1.189, which suggesting that the stock is 18.916% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Issuer Direct has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.053%.

SoundThinking has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Issuer Direct offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SoundThinking pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Issuer Direct pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SoundThinking quarterly revenues are $26.3M, which are larger than Issuer Direct quarterly revenues of $7M. SoundThinking's net income of -$1.4M is lower than Issuer Direct's net income of -$466K. Notably, SoundThinking's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Issuer Direct's PE ratio is 57.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SoundThinking is 1.50x versus 1.16x for Issuer Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.