Why Is Coinbase Stock Going Down?
Every way you look at it, Coinbase has had a…
Sell
36
SETM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$15.30
Seasonality move
:
-4.77%
Day range:
$15.17 - $15.41
52-week range:
$14.30 - $20.95
Dividend yield:
2.03%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
48.2K
Avg. volume:
15K
1-year change:
-14.63%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COPP
Sprott Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PYZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TBLU
Tortoise Global Water ESG Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
$15.35 | -- | -- | -- | $0.31 | 2.03% | -- |
|
COPP
Sprott Copper Miners ETF
|
$20.76 | -- | -- | -- | $0.53 | 2.56% | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
$31.79 | -- | -- | -- | $0.97 | 3.04% | -- |
|
PYZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF
|
$87.46 | -- | -- | -- | $0.25 | 1.12% | -- |
|
TBLU
Tortoise Global Water ESG Fund
|
$47.60 | -- | -- | -- | $0.30 | 1.2% | -- |
|
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
|
$28.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 6.07% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
-- | 0.336 | -- | -- |
|
COPP
Sprott Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | 1.268 | -- | -- |
|
PYZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF
|
-- | 1.524 | -- | -- |
|
TBLU
Tortoise Global Water ESG Fund
|
-- | 1.119 | -- | -- |
|
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
|
-- | -0.162 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COPP
Sprott Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PYZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TBLU
Tortoise Global Water ESG Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Sprott Critical Materials ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SETM or COPP?
Sprott Copper Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Sprott Critical Materials ETF's net margin of --. Sprott Critical Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Copper Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- COPPSprott Copper Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SETM or COPP?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Copper Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sprott Critical Materials ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Copper Miners ETF, analysts believe Sprott Critical Materials ETF is more attractive than Sprott Copper Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF0 0 0 COPPSprott Copper Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is SETM or COPP More Risky?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Copper Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SETM or COPP?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. Sprott Copper Miners ETF offers a yield of 2.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Sprott Critical Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Copper Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SETM or COPP?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Copper Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Sprott Critical Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Copper Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Sprott Critical Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Copper Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott Critical Materials ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Copper Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- -- COPPSprott Copper Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SETM or CUT?
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Sprott Critical Materials ETF's net margin of --. Sprott Critical Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SETM or CUT?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sprott Critical Materials ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF, analysts believe Sprott Critical Materials ETF is more attractive than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF0 0 0 CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF0 0 0 -
Is SETM or CUT More Risky?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a beta of 0.998, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.16699999999999%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SETM or CUT?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF offers a yield of 3.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share. Sprott Critical Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SETM or CUT?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF quarterly revenues of --. Sprott Critical Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's net income of --. Notably, Sprott Critical Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott Critical Materials ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SETM or PYZ?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Sprott Critical Materials ETF's net margin of --. Sprott Critical Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- PYZInvesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SETM or PYZ?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sprott Critical Materials ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF, analysts believe Sprott Critical Materials ETF is more attractive than Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF0 0 0 PYZInvesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF0 0 0 -
Is SETM or PYZ More Risky?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF has a beta of 1.385, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.538%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SETM or PYZ?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Sprott Critical Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SETM or PYZ?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF quarterly revenues of --. Sprott Critical Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF's net income of --. Notably, Sprott Critical Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott Critical Materials ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- -- PYZInvesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SETM or TBLU?
Tortoise Global Water ESG Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Sprott Critical Materials ETF's net margin of --. Sprott Critical Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat Tortoise Global Water ESG Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- TBLUTortoise Global Water ESG Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SETM or TBLU?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tortoise Global Water ESG Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sprott Critical Materials ETF has higher upside potential than Tortoise Global Water ESG Fund, analysts believe Sprott Critical Materials ETF is more attractive than Tortoise Global Water ESG Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF0 0 0 TBLUTortoise Global Water ESG Fund0 0 0 -
Is SETM or TBLU More Risky?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tortoise Global Water ESG Fund has a beta of 1.030, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.041%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SETM or TBLU?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. Tortoise Global Water ESG Fund offers a yield of 1.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Sprott Critical Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tortoise Global Water ESG Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SETM or TBLU?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tortoise Global Water ESG Fund quarterly revenues of --. Sprott Critical Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than Tortoise Global Water ESG Fund's net income of --. Notably, Sprott Critical Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tortoise Global Water ESG Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott Critical Materials ETF is -- versus -- for Tortoise Global Water ESG Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- -- TBLUTortoise Global Water ESG Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SETM or URA?
Global X Uranium ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Sprott Critical Materials ETF's net margin of --. Sprott Critical Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Uranium ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SETM or URA?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Uranium ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sprott Critical Materials ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Uranium ETF, analysts believe Sprott Critical Materials ETF is more attractive than Global X Uranium ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF0 0 0 URAGlobal X Uranium ETF0 0 0 -
Is SETM or URA More Risky?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Uranium ETF has a beta of 1.023, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.316%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SETM or URA?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. Global X Uranium ETF offers a yield of 6.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Sprott Critical Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Uranium ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SETM or URA?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Uranium ETF quarterly revenues of --. Sprott Critical Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Uranium ETF's net income of --. Notably, Sprott Critical Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Uranium ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott Critical Materials ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Uranium ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- -- URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Uber Stock a Buy on the Dip?
Shares of Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER) have been fading fast in…
Is AMD Stock an All-Time Buy?
Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD) is a high-growth AI stock that…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 115x
Buy
54
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
50
LMND alert for Dec 28
Lemonade [LMND] is down 10.69% over the past day.
Sell
50
TSLL alert for Dec 28
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 9.92% over the past day.
Buy
63
SMLR alert for Dec 28
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is down 9.65% over the past day.
