Is Revolve Group Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
Recently, Revolve Group (NYSE:RVLV) management delivered some fairly positive business…
Buy
56
SAIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$116.44
Seasonality move
:
4.53%
Day range:
$109.95 - $116.65
52-week range:
$94.68 - $156.34
Dividend yield:
1.27%
P/E ratio:
16.21x
P/S ratio:
0.79x
P/B ratio:
3.53x
Volume:
610.6K
Avg. volume:
1.1M
1-year change:
-7.79%
Market cap:
$5.6B
Revenue:
$7.5B
EPS (TTM):
$7.19
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SAIC
Science Applications International
|
$1.8B | $2.09 | 1.4% | 46.34% | $124.50 |
|
CSPI
CSP
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
INLX
Intellinetics
|
$4.5M | -- | -1.16% | -- | $17.50 |
|
LDOS
Leidos Holdings
|
$4.1B | $2.49 | 3.3% | 20.73% | $170.21 |
|
SGN
Signing Day Sports
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WYY
WidePoint
|
$37.8M | -- | 10.47% | -- | $6.50 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SAIC
Science Applications International
|
$116.52 | $124.50 | $5.6B | 16.21x | $0.37 | 1.27% | 0.79x |
|
CSPI
CSP
|
$14.63 | -- | $144.6M | 1,463.00x | $0.03 | 0.82% | 2.46x |
|
INLX
Intellinetics
|
$13.98 | $17.50 | $59.5M | 248.75x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.36x |
|
LDOS
Leidos Holdings
|
$141.88 | $170.21 | $18.6B | 15.36x | $0.40 | 1.1% | 1.16x |
|
SGN
Signing Day Sports
|
$0.81 | -- | $464.2K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.46x |
|
WYY
WidePoint
|
$2.82 | $6.50 | $27.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.19x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SAIC
Science Applications International
|
58.47% | -0.792 | 42.71% | 0.76x |
|
CSPI
CSP
|
5.16% | 3.321 | 1.63% | 2.90x |
|
INLX
Intellinetics
|
10.88% | 1.004 | 2.22% | 0.76x |
|
LDOS
Leidos Holdings
|
51.42% | -0.257 | 24.23% | 0.98x |
|
SGN
Signing Day Sports
|
-22.66% | 6.004 | 5.11% | 0.01x |
|
WYY
WidePoint
|
-- | 4.736 | -- | 1.02x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SAIC
Science Applications International
|
$232M | $136M | 9.48% | 21.66% | 7.4% | $100M |
|
CSPI
CSP
|
$4.6M | -$354K | 0.44% | 0.46% | 2.77% | $1.7M |
|
INLX
Intellinetics
|
$2.8M | -$12.9K | -4.48% | -5.34% | -0.3% | $73.3K |
|
LDOS
Leidos Holdings
|
$693M | $414M | 13.75% | 28.23% | 9.67% | $213M |
|
SGN
Signing Day Sports
|
$25.1K | -$1.4M | -805.48% | -- | -2675.61% | -$526.4K |
|
WYY
WidePoint
|
$4.7M | -$451K | -20.12% | -20.12% | -1.13% | $1.8M |
Science Applications International vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SAIC or CSPI?
CSP has a net margin of 5.33% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of 3.01%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 21.66% beat CSP's return on equity of 0.46%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SAICScience Applications International12.62% $2.00 $3.8B CSPICSP29.13% $0.05 $50M -
What do Analysts Say About SAIC or CSPI?
Science Applications International has a consensus price target of $124.50, signalling upside risk potential of 6.85%. On the other hand CSP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Science Applications International has higher upside potential than CSP, analysts believe Science Applications International is more attractive than CSP.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SAICScience Applications International2 7 0 CSPICSP0 0 0 -
Is SAIC or CSPI More Risky?
Science Applications International has a beta of 0.581, which suggesting that the stock is 41.891% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CSP has a beta of 1.220, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.961%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SAIC or CSPI?
Science Applications International has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. CSP offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Science Applications International pays 20.72% of its earnings as a dividend. CSP pays out -312.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SAIC or CSPI?
Science Applications International quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than CSP quarterly revenues of $15.7M. Science Applications International's net income of $98M is higher than CSP's net income of $472K. Notably, Science Applications International's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.21x while CSP's PE ratio is 1,463.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Science Applications International is 0.79x versus 2.46x for CSP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SAICScience Applications International0.79x 16.21x $1.8B $98M CSPICSP2.46x 1,463.00x $15.7M $472K
-
Which has Higher Returns SAIC or INLX?
Intellinetics has a net margin of 5.33% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of -1.26%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 21.66% beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -5.34%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SAICScience Applications International12.62% $2.00 $3.8B INLXIntellinetics65.8% -$0.01 $11.9M -
What do Analysts Say About SAIC or INLX?
Science Applications International has a consensus price target of $124.50, signalling upside risk potential of 6.85%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $17.50 which suggests that it could grow by 25.18%. Given that Intellinetics has higher upside potential than Science Applications International, analysts believe Intellinetics is more attractive than Science Applications International.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SAICScience Applications International2 7 0 INLXIntellinetics0 0 0 -
Is SAIC or INLX More Risky?
Science Applications International has a beta of 0.581, which suggesting that the stock is 41.891% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.627, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.332%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SAIC or INLX?
Science Applications International has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Science Applications International pays 20.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SAIC or INLX?
Science Applications International quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.3M. Science Applications International's net income of $98M is higher than Intellinetics's net income of -$53.7K. Notably, Science Applications International's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.21x while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Science Applications International is 0.79x versus 3.36x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SAICScience Applications International0.79x 16.21x $1.8B $98M INLXIntellinetics3.36x 248.75x $4.3M -$53.7K
-
Which has Higher Returns SAIC or LDOS?
Leidos Holdings has a net margin of 5.33% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of 6.51%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 21.66% beat Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 28.23%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SAICScience Applications International12.62% $2.00 $3.8B LDOSLeidos Holdings15.88% $2.12 $9.1B -
What do Analysts Say About SAIC or LDOS?
Science Applications International has a consensus price target of $124.50, signalling upside risk potential of 6.85%. On the other hand Leidos Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $170.21 which suggests that it could grow by 19.97%. Given that Leidos Holdings has higher upside potential than Science Applications International, analysts believe Leidos Holdings is more attractive than Science Applications International.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SAICScience Applications International2 7 0 LDOSLeidos Holdings8 7 0 -
Is SAIC or LDOS More Risky?
Science Applications International has a beta of 0.581, which suggesting that the stock is 41.891% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.661, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.933%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SAIC or LDOS?
Science Applications International has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. Leidos Holdings offers a yield of 1.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Science Applications International pays 20.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings pays out 16.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SAIC or LDOS?
Science Applications International quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Science Applications International's net income of $98M is lower than Leidos Holdings's net income of $284M. Notably, Science Applications International's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.21x while Leidos Holdings's PE ratio is 15.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Science Applications International is 0.79x versus 1.16x for Leidos Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SAICScience Applications International0.79x 16.21x $1.8B $98M LDOSLeidos Holdings1.16x 15.36x $4.4B $284M
-
Which has Higher Returns SAIC or SGN?
Signing Day Sports has a net margin of 5.33% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of -2893.73%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 21.66% beat Signing Day Sports's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SAICScience Applications International12.62% $2.00 $3.8B SGNSigning Day Sports45.34% -$4.32 -$1.2M -
What do Analysts Say About SAIC or SGN?
Science Applications International has a consensus price target of $124.50, signalling upside risk potential of 6.85%. On the other hand Signing Day Sports has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Science Applications International has higher upside potential than Signing Day Sports, analysts believe Science Applications International is more attractive than Signing Day Sports.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SAICScience Applications International2 7 0 SGNSigning Day Sports0 0 0 -
Is SAIC or SGN More Risky?
Science Applications International has a beta of 0.581, which suggesting that the stock is 41.891% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Signing Day Sports has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SAIC or SGN?
Science Applications International has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. Signing Day Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Science Applications International pays 20.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Signing Day Sports pays out -14.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SAIC or SGN?
Science Applications International quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Signing Day Sports quarterly revenues of $55.4K. Science Applications International's net income of $98M is higher than Signing Day Sports's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Science Applications International's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.21x while Signing Day Sports's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Science Applications International is 0.79x versus 0.46x for Signing Day Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SAICScience Applications International0.79x 16.21x $1.8B $98M SGNSigning Day Sports0.46x -- $55.4K -$1.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns SAIC or WYY?
WidePoint has a net margin of 5.33% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of -1.23%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 21.66% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SAICScience Applications International12.62% $2.00 $3.8B WYYWidePoint13.55% -$0.04 $13.8M -
What do Analysts Say About SAIC or WYY?
Science Applications International has a consensus price target of $124.50, signalling upside risk potential of 6.85%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 130.33%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Science Applications International, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Science Applications International.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SAICScience Applications International2 7 0 WYYWidePoint1 0 0 -
Is SAIC or WYY More Risky?
Science Applications International has a beta of 0.581, which suggesting that the stock is 41.891% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.832, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.194%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SAIC or WYY?
Science Applications International has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Science Applications International pays 20.72% of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SAIC or WYY?
Science Applications International quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Science Applications International's net income of $98M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, Science Applications International's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.21x while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Science Applications International is 0.79x versus 0.19x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SAICScience Applications International0.79x 16.21x $1.8B $98M WYYWidePoint0.19x -- $34.6M -$425.2K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Bloom Energy Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
While already interesting as the world moves toward greener energy…
What Do Tesla Delivery Numbers Mean for Tesla Stock?
Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) released Q1 delivery numbers, showing a substantial slowdown…
Stock Ideas
Sell
45
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Buy
52
RGC alert for Apr 12
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 29.14% over the past day.
Buy
52
SLP alert for Apr 12
Simulations Plus [SLP] is up 26.73% over the past day.
Buy
89
GDXU alert for Apr 12
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 15.9% over the past day.
