QFIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dunxin Financial Holdings has a net margin of 52.32% compared to Qifu Technology's net margin of --. Qifu Technology's return on equity of 27.42% beat Dunxin Financial Holdings's return on equity of --.

Qifu Technology has a consensus price target of $54.77, signalling upside risk potential of 33.83%. On the other hand Dunxin Financial Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Qifu Technology has higher upside potential than Dunxin Financial Holdings, analysts believe Qifu Technology is more attractive than Dunxin Financial Holdings.

Qifu Technology has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.47% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dunxin Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Qifu Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. Dunxin Financial Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Qifu Technology pays 20.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Dunxin Financial Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Qifu Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Qifu Technology quarterly revenues are $509.1M, which are larger than Dunxin Financial Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Qifu Technology's net income of $266.4M is higher than Dunxin Financial Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Qifu Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.05x while Dunxin Financial Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Qifu Technology is 3.20x versus -- for Dunxin Financial Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FinVolution Group has a net margin of 52.32% compared to Qifu Technology's net margin of 19.69%. Qifu Technology's return on equity of 27.42% beat FinVolution Group's return on equity of 16.39%.

Qifu Technology has a consensus price target of $54.77, signalling upside risk potential of 33.83%. On the other hand FinVolution Group has an analysts' consensus of $11.77 which suggests that it could grow by 53.08%. Given that FinVolution Group has higher upside potential than Qifu Technology, analysts believe FinVolution Group is more attractive than Qifu Technology.

Qifu Technology has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.47% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FinVolution Group has a beta of 0.333, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.75%.

Qifu Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. FinVolution Group offers a yield of 3.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Qifu Technology pays 20.16% of its earnings as a dividend. FinVolution Group pays out 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Qifu Technology quarterly revenues are $509.1M, which are larger than FinVolution Group quarterly revenues of $480.4M. Qifu Technology's net income of $266.4M is higher than FinVolution Group's net income of $94.6M. Notably, Qifu Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.05x while FinVolution Group's PE ratio is 6.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Qifu Technology is 3.20x versus 1.11x for FinVolution Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LexinFintech Holdings has a net margin of 52.32% compared to Qifu Technology's net margin of 9.91%. Qifu Technology's return on equity of 27.42% beat LexinFintech Holdings's return on equity of 10.78%.

Qifu Technology has a consensus price target of $54.77, signalling upside risk potential of 33.83%. On the other hand LexinFintech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $11.90 which suggests that it could grow by 44.57%. Given that LexinFintech Holdings has higher upside potential than Qifu Technology, analysts believe LexinFintech Holdings is more attractive than Qifu Technology.

Qifu Technology has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.47% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LexinFintech Holdings has a beta of 0.320, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.952%.

Qifu Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. LexinFintech Holdings offers a yield of 2.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Qifu Technology pays 20.16% of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings pays out 14.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Qifu Technology quarterly revenues are $509.1M, which are larger than LexinFintech Holdings quarterly revenues of $508.5M. Qifu Technology's net income of $266.4M is higher than LexinFintech Holdings's net income of $50.4M. Notably, Qifu Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.05x while LexinFintech Holdings's PE ratio is 9.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Qifu Technology is 3.20x versus 0.71x for LexinFintech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UP Fintech Holding has a net margin of 52.32% compared to Qifu Technology's net margin of 22.6%. Qifu Technology's return on equity of 27.42% beat UP Fintech Holding's return on equity of 11.24%.

Qifu Technology has a consensus price target of $54.77, signalling upside risk potential of 33.83%. On the other hand UP Fintech Holding has an analysts' consensus of $9.86 which suggests that it could grow by 27.5%. Given that Qifu Technology has higher upside potential than UP Fintech Holding, analysts believe Qifu Technology is more attractive than UP Fintech Holding.

Qifu Technology has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.47% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UP Fintech Holding has a beta of 0.646, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.388%.

Qifu Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. UP Fintech Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Qifu Technology pays 20.16% of its earnings as a dividend. UP Fintech Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Qifu Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Qifu Technology quarterly revenues are $509.1M, which are larger than UP Fintech Holding quarterly revenues of $124.1M. Qifu Technology's net income of $266.4M is higher than UP Fintech Holding's net income of $28.1M. Notably, Qifu Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.05x while UP Fintech Holding's PE ratio is 21.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Qifu Technology is 3.20x versus 3.30x for UP Fintech Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.