OPEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

eXp World Holdings has a net margin of -10.42% compared to Opendoor Technologies's net margin of -0.87%. Opendoor Technologies's return on equity of -46.39% beat eXp World Holdings's return on equity of -9.64%.

Opendoor Technologies has a consensus price target of $1.47, signalling upside risk potential of 30.29%. On the other hand eXp World Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $14.75 which suggests that it could grow by 47.94%. Given that eXp World Holdings has higher upside potential than Opendoor Technologies, analysts believe eXp World Holdings is more attractive than Opendoor Technologies.

Opendoor Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eXp World Holdings has a beta of 2.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.056%.

Opendoor Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. eXp World Holdings offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Opendoor Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. eXp World Holdings pays out -141.53% of its earnings as a dividend.

Opendoor Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than eXp World Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Opendoor Technologies's net income of -$113M is lower than eXp World Holdings's net income of -$9.5M. Notably, Opendoor Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while eXp World Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Opendoor Technologies is 0.15x versus 0.34x for eXp World Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FRP Holdings has a net margin of -10.42% compared to Opendoor Technologies's net margin of 15.94%. Opendoor Technologies's return on equity of -46.39% beat FRP Holdings's return on equity of 1.4%.

Opendoor Technologies has a consensus price target of $1.47, signalling upside risk potential of 30.29%. On the other hand FRP Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Opendoor Technologies has higher upside potential than FRP Holdings, analysts believe Opendoor Technologies is more attractive than FRP Holdings.

Opendoor Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FRP Holdings has a beta of 0.490, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.973%.

Opendoor Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FRP Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Opendoor Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FRP Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Opendoor Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than FRP Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.5M. Opendoor Technologies's net income of -$113M is lower than FRP Holdings's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Opendoor Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FRP Holdings's PE ratio is 84.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Opendoor Technologies is 0.15x versus 13.01x for FRP Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Redfin has a net margin of -10.42% compared to Opendoor Technologies's net margin of -14.89%. Opendoor Technologies's return on equity of -46.39% beat Redfin's return on equity of -1694.25%.

Opendoor Technologies has a consensus price target of $1.47, signalling upside risk potential of 30.29%. On the other hand Redfin has an analysts' consensus of $10.13 which suggests that it could fall by -0.78%. Given that Opendoor Technologies has higher upside potential than Redfin, analysts believe Opendoor Technologies is more attractive than Redfin.

Opendoor Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Redfin has a beta of 2.898, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 189.755%.

Opendoor Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Redfin offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Opendoor Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Redfin pays out -0.22% of its earnings as a dividend.

Opendoor Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Redfin quarterly revenues of $244.3M. Opendoor Technologies's net income of -$113M is lower than Redfin's net income of -$36.4M. Notably, Opendoor Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Redfin's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Opendoor Technologies is 0.15x versus 1.19x for Redfin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safe & Green Development has a net margin of -10.42% compared to Opendoor Technologies's net margin of -2883.88%. Opendoor Technologies's return on equity of -46.39% beat Safe & Green Development's return on equity of --.

Opendoor Technologies has a consensus price target of $1.47, signalling upside risk potential of 30.29%. On the other hand Safe & Green Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Opendoor Technologies has higher upside potential than Safe & Green Development, analysts believe Opendoor Technologies is more attractive than Safe & Green Development.

Opendoor Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe & Green Development has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Opendoor Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Safe & Green Development offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Opendoor Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Safe & Green Development pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Opendoor Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Safe & Green Development quarterly revenues of $81.2K. Opendoor Technologies's net income of -$113M is lower than Safe & Green Development's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Opendoor Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Safe & Green Development's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Opendoor Technologies is 0.15x versus -- for Safe & Green Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.