OKTA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Box has a net margin of 3.37% compared to Okta's net margin of 69.41%. Okta's return on equity of 0.46% beat Box's return on equity of 290.83%.

Okta has a consensus price target of $116.68, signalling upside risk potential of 2.59%. On the other hand Box has an analysts' consensus of $35.90 which suggests that it could grow by 18.21%. Given that Box has higher upside potential than Okta, analysts believe Box is more attractive than Okta.

Okta has a beta of 1.090, which suggesting that the stock is 8.984% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Box has a beta of 0.999, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.095000000000001%.

Okta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Box offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Okta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Box pays out 6.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Box's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Okta quarterly revenues are $682M, which are larger than Box quarterly revenues of $279.5M. Okta's net income of $23M is lower than Box's net income of $194M. Notably, Okta's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,843.50x while Box's PE ratio is 22.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Okta is 7.67x versus 4.14x for Box. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a net margin of 3.37% compared to Okta's net margin of -8.72%. Okta's return on equity of 0.46% beat CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -0.68%.

Okta has a consensus price target of $116.68, signalling upside risk potential of 2.59%. On the other hand CrowdStrike Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $409.01 which suggests that it could grow by 12.91%. Given that CrowdStrike Holdings has higher upside potential than Okta, analysts believe CrowdStrike Holdings is more attractive than Okta.

Okta has a beta of 1.090, which suggesting that the stock is 8.984% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.195, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.529%.

Okta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CrowdStrike Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Okta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CrowdStrike Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Okta quarterly revenues are $682M, which are smaller than CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Okta's net income of $23M is higher than CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$92.3M. Notably, Okta's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,843.50x while CrowdStrike Holdings's PE ratio is 765.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Okta is 7.67x versus 22.77x for CrowdStrike Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 3.37% compared to Okta's net margin of 34.62%. Okta's return on equity of 0.46% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34%.

Okta has a consensus price target of $116.68, signalling upside risk potential of 2.59%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $506.24 which suggests that it could grow by 29.39%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Okta, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Okta.

Okta has a beta of 1.090, which suggesting that the stock is 8.984% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.918, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.215%.

Okta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Okta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Okta quarterly revenues are $682M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $69.6B. Okta's net income of $23M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.1B. Notably, Okta's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,843.50x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 31.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Okta is 7.67x versus 11.17x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rapid7 has a net margin of 3.37% compared to Okta's net margin of -0.69%. Okta's return on equity of 0.46% beat Rapid7's return on equity of --.

Okta has a consensus price target of $116.68, signalling upside risk potential of 2.59%. On the other hand Rapid7 has an analysts' consensus of $39.25 which suggests that it could grow by 38.74%. Given that Rapid7 has higher upside potential than Okta, analysts believe Rapid7 is more attractive than Okta.

Okta has a beta of 1.090, which suggesting that the stock is 8.984% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rapid7 has a beta of 0.916, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.355%.

Okta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rapid7 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Okta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rapid7 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Okta quarterly revenues are $682M, which are larger than Rapid7 quarterly revenues of $216.3M. Okta's net income of $23M is higher than Rapid7's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Okta's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,843.50x while Rapid7's PE ratio is 72.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Okta is 7.67x versus 2.40x for Rapid7. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.