NNDM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of -56.18% compared to Nano Dimension's net margin of 3.37%. Nano Dimension's return on equity of -9.37% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity of 5.77%.

Nano Dimension has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 320.17%. On the other hand Formula Systems (1985) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nano Dimension has higher upside potential than Formula Systems (1985), analysts believe Nano Dimension is more attractive than Formula Systems (1985).

Nano Dimension has a beta of 1.646, which suggesting that the stock is 64.637% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.81%.

Nano Dimension has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Formula Systems (1985) offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Nano Dimension pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985) pays out 15.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nano Dimension quarterly revenues are $14.9M, which are smaller than Formula Systems (1985) quarterly revenues of $699.9M. Nano Dimension's net income of -$8.3M is lower than Formula Systems (1985)'s net income of $23.6M. Notably, Nano Dimension's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Formula Systems (1985)'s PE ratio is 17.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Dimension is 8.73x versus 0.48x for Formula Systems (1985). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SatixFy Communications has a net margin of -56.18% compared to Nano Dimension's net margin of -539.62%. Nano Dimension's return on equity of -9.37% beat SatixFy Communications's return on equity of --.

Nano Dimension has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 320.17%. On the other hand SatixFy Communications has an analysts' consensus of $2.25 which suggests that it could grow by 46.1%. Given that Nano Dimension has higher upside potential than SatixFy Communications, analysts believe Nano Dimension is more attractive than SatixFy Communications.

Nano Dimension has a beta of 1.646, which suggesting that the stock is 64.637% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SatixFy Communications has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nano Dimension has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SatixFy Communications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nano Dimension pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SatixFy Communications pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano Dimension quarterly revenues are $14.9M, which are larger than SatixFy Communications quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Nano Dimension's net income of -$8.3M is higher than SatixFy Communications's net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Nano Dimension's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SatixFy Communications's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Dimension is 8.73x versus 12.43x for SatixFy Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Silynxcom has a net margin of -56.18% compared to Nano Dimension's net margin of --. Nano Dimension's return on equity of -9.37% beat Silynxcom's return on equity of --.

Nano Dimension has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 320.17%. On the other hand Silynxcom has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 90.93%. Given that Nano Dimension has higher upside potential than Silynxcom, analysts believe Nano Dimension is more attractive than Silynxcom.

Nano Dimension has a beta of 1.646, which suggesting that the stock is 64.637% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silynxcom has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nano Dimension has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Silynxcom offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nano Dimension pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Silynxcom pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano Dimension quarterly revenues are $14.9M, which are larger than Silynxcom quarterly revenues of --. Nano Dimension's net income of -$8.3M is higher than Silynxcom's net income of --. Notably, Nano Dimension's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Silynxcom's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Dimension is 8.73x versus -- for Silynxcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wix.com has a net margin of -56.18% compared to Nano Dimension's net margin of 6.02%. Nano Dimension's return on equity of -9.37% beat Wix.com's return on equity of --.

Nano Dimension has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 320.17%. On the other hand Wix.com has an analysts' consensus of $233.34 which suggests that it could grow by 6.73%. Given that Nano Dimension has higher upside potential than Wix.com, analysts believe Nano Dimension is more attractive than Wix.com.

Nano Dimension has a beta of 1.646, which suggesting that the stock is 64.637% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wix.com has a beta of 1.559, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.879%.

Nano Dimension has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wix.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nano Dimension pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wix.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano Dimension quarterly revenues are $14.9M, which are smaller than Wix.com quarterly revenues of $444.7M. Nano Dimension's net income of -$8.3M is lower than Wix.com's net income of $26.8M. Notably, Nano Dimension's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Wix.com's PE ratio is 136.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Dimension is 8.73x versus 7.54x for Wix.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.