NFE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

New Jersey Resources has a net margin of 1.64% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of 23.02%. New Fortress Energy's return on equity of 11.23% beat New Jersey Resources's return on equity of 13.7%.

New Fortress Energy has a consensus price target of $19.63, signalling upside risk potential of 36.11%. On the other hand New Jersey Resources has an analysts' consensus of $53.57 which suggests that it could grow by 14.69%. Given that New Fortress Energy has higher upside potential than New Jersey Resources, analysts believe New Fortress Energy is more attractive than New Jersey Resources.

New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.608, which suggesting that the stock is 60.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Jersey Resources has a beta of 0.625, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.476%.

New Fortress Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. New Jersey Resources offers a yield of 3.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. New Fortress Energy pays 132.14% of its earnings as a dividend. New Jersey Resources pays out 56.96% of its earnings as a dividend. New Jersey Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but New Fortress Energy's is not.

New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues are $567.5M, which are larger than New Jersey Resources quarterly revenues of $395.8M. New Fortress Energy's net income of $9.3M is lower than New Jersey Resources's net income of $91.1M. Notably, New Fortress Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.95x while New Jersey Resources's PE ratio is 16.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Fortress Energy is 1.23x versus 2.58x for New Jersey Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OPAL Fuels has a net margin of 1.64% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of 5.92%. New Fortress Energy's return on equity of 11.23% beat OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 3.38%.

New Fortress Energy has a consensus price target of $19.63, signalling upside risk potential of 36.11%. On the other hand OPAL Fuels has an analysts' consensus of $9.20 which suggests that it could grow by 120.98%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than New Fortress Energy, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than New Fortress Energy.

New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.608, which suggesting that the stock is 60.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

New Fortress Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. OPAL Fuels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. New Fortress Energy pays 132.14% of its earnings as a dividend. OPAL Fuels pays out 55.22% of its earnings as a dividend. OPAL Fuels's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but New Fortress Energy's is not.

New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues are $567.5M, which are larger than OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues of $84M. New Fortress Energy's net income of $9.3M is higher than OPAL Fuels's net income of $5M. Notably, New Fortress Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.95x while OPAL Fuels's PE ratio is 18.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Fortress Energy is 1.23x versus 0.30x for OPAL Fuels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RGC Resources has a net margin of 1.64% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of 1.08%. New Fortress Energy's return on equity of 11.23% beat RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.06%.

New Fortress Energy has a consensus price target of $19.63, signalling upside risk potential of 36.11%. On the other hand RGC Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 32.81%. Given that New Fortress Energy has higher upside potential than RGC Resources, analysts believe New Fortress Energy is more attractive than RGC Resources.

New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.608, which suggesting that the stock is 60.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RGC Resources has a beta of 0.169, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.111%.

New Fortress Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. RGC Resources offers a yield of 3.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. New Fortress Energy pays 132.14% of its earnings as a dividend. RGC Resources pays out 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. RGC Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but New Fortress Energy's is not.

New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues are $567.5M, which are larger than RGC Resources quarterly revenues of $13.1M. New Fortress Energy's net income of $9.3M is higher than RGC Resources's net income of $140.8K. Notably, New Fortress Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.95x while RGC Resources's PE ratio is 17.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Fortress Energy is 1.23x versus 2.44x for RGC Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sempra has a net margin of 1.64% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of 23.38%. New Fortress Energy's return on equity of 11.23% beat Sempra's return on equity of 8.49%.

New Fortress Energy has a consensus price target of $19.63, signalling upside risk potential of 36.11%. On the other hand Sempra has an analysts' consensus of $94.42 which suggests that it could grow by 7.77%. Given that New Fortress Energy has higher upside potential than Sempra, analysts believe New Fortress Energy is more attractive than Sempra.

New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.608, which suggesting that the stock is 60.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sempra has a beta of 0.775, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.455%.

New Fortress Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Sempra offers a yield of 2.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. New Fortress Energy pays 132.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Sempra pays out 49.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Sempra's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but New Fortress Energy's is not.

New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues are $567.5M, which are smaller than Sempra quarterly revenues of $2.8B. New Fortress Energy's net income of $9.3M is lower than Sempra's net income of $649M. Notably, New Fortress Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.95x while Sempra's PE ratio is 19.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Fortress Energy is 1.23x versus 4.31x for Sempra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.