MPWR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadcom has a net margin of 23.29% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of 36.89%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 75.35% beat Broadcom's return on equity of 14.67%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $817.74, signalling upside risk potential of 41.02%. On the other hand Broadcom has an analysts' consensus of $250.42 which suggests that it could grow by 48.07%. Given that Broadcom has higher upside potential than Monolithic Power Systems, analysts believe Broadcom is more attractive than Monolithic Power Systems.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.034, which suggesting that the stock is 3.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.69399999999999%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.86%. Broadcom offers a yield of 1.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 13.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom pays out 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Broadcom's is not.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $621.7M, which are smaller than Broadcom quarterly revenues of $14.9B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $1.4B is lower than Broadcom's net income of $5.5B. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while Broadcom's PE ratio is 81.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 12.83x versus 14.83x for Broadcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microchip Technology has a net margin of 23.29% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of -5.22%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 75.35% beat Microchip Technology's return on equity of 4.76%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $817.74, signalling upside risk potential of 41.02%. On the other hand Microchip Technology has an analysts' consensus of $65.82 which suggests that it could grow by 35.16%. Given that Monolithic Power Systems has higher upside potential than Microchip Technology, analysts believe Monolithic Power Systems is more attractive than Microchip Technology.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.034, which suggesting that the stock is 3.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microchip Technology has a beta of 1.525, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.52%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.86%. Microchip Technology offers a yield of 3.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 13.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Microchip Technology pays out 47.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $621.7M, which are smaller than Microchip Technology quarterly revenues of $1B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $1.4B is higher than Microchip Technology's net income of -$53.6M. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while Microchip Technology's PE ratio is 86.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 12.83x versus 5.55x for Microchip Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 23.29% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of 11.02%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 75.35% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $817.74, signalling upside risk potential of 41.02%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $112.79 which suggests that it could grow by 81.8%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Monolithic Power Systems, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Monolithic Power Systems.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.034, which suggesting that the stock is 3.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.424, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.435%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.86%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 13.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $621.7M, which are smaller than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $1.4B is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 12.83x versus 9.31x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 23.29% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of 56.17%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 75.35% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $817.74, signalling upside risk potential of 41.02%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $171.01 which suggests that it could grow by 55.93%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Monolithic Power Systems, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Monolithic Power Systems.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.034, which suggesting that the stock is 3.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.766, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.633%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.86%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 13.47% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $621.7M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $1.4B is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 37.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 12.83x versus 20.85x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.