KPLT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Amdocs has a net margin of -14.74% compared to Katapult Holdings's net margin of 13.62%. Katapult Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Amdocs's return on equity of 13.99%.

Katapult Holdings has a consensus price target of $10.50, signalling upside risk potential of 41.32%. On the other hand Amdocs has an analysts' consensus of $101.50 which suggests that it could grow by 22.02%. Given that Katapult Holdings has higher upside potential than Amdocs, analysts believe Katapult Holdings is more attractive than Amdocs.

Katapult Holdings has a beta of 1.300, which suggesting that the stock is 30.025% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amdocs has a beta of 0.586, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.422%.

Katapult Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amdocs offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Katapult Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amdocs pays out 42.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Amdocs's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Katapult Holdings quarterly revenues are $60.3M, which are smaller than Amdocs quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Katapult Holdings's net income of -$8.9M is lower than Amdocs's net income of $151.1M. Notably, Katapult Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amdocs's PE ratio is 19.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Katapult Holdings is 0.13x versus 1.93x for Amdocs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intellinetics has a net margin of -14.74% compared to Katapult Holdings's net margin of -1.26%. Katapult Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -5.34%.

Katapult Holdings has a consensus price target of $10.50, signalling upside risk potential of 41.32%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $17.50 which suggests that it could grow by 25.18%. Given that Katapult Holdings has higher upside potential than Intellinetics, analysts believe Katapult Holdings is more attractive than Intellinetics.

Katapult Holdings has a beta of 1.300, which suggesting that the stock is 30.025% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.627, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.332%.

Katapult Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Katapult Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Katapult Holdings quarterly revenues are $60.3M, which are larger than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.3M. Katapult Holdings's net income of -$8.9M is lower than Intellinetics's net income of -$53.7K. Notably, Katapult Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Katapult Holdings is 0.13x versus 3.36x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Signing Day Sports has a net margin of -14.74% compared to Katapult Holdings's net margin of -2893.73%. Katapult Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Signing Day Sports's return on equity of --.

Katapult Holdings has a consensus price target of $10.50, signalling upside risk potential of 41.32%. On the other hand Signing Day Sports has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Katapult Holdings has higher upside potential than Signing Day Sports, analysts believe Katapult Holdings is more attractive than Signing Day Sports.

Katapult Holdings has a beta of 1.300, which suggesting that the stock is 30.025% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Signing Day Sports has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Katapult Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Signing Day Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Katapult Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Signing Day Sports pays out -14.6% of its earnings as a dividend.

Katapult Holdings quarterly revenues are $60.3M, which are larger than Signing Day Sports quarterly revenues of $55.4K. Katapult Holdings's net income of -$8.9M is lower than Signing Day Sports's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Katapult Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Signing Day Sports's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Katapult Holdings is 0.13x versus 0.46x for Signing Day Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of -14.74% compared to Katapult Holdings's net margin of -1.23%. Katapult Holdings's return on equity of -- beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

Katapult Holdings has a consensus price target of $10.50, signalling upside risk potential of 41.32%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 130.33%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Katapult Holdings, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Katapult Holdings.

Katapult Holdings has a beta of 1.300, which suggesting that the stock is 30.025% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.832, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.194%.

Katapult Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Katapult Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Katapult Holdings quarterly revenues are $60.3M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Katapult Holdings's net income of -$8.9M is lower than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, Katapult Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Katapult Holdings is 0.13x versus 0.19x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.