INTZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fiserv has a net margin of -116.77% compared to Intrusion's net margin of 17.86%. Intrusion's return on equity of -3738% beat Fiserv's return on equity of 10.79%.

Intrusion has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 500.57%. On the other hand Fiserv has an analysts' consensus of $254.86 which suggests that it could grow by 28.33%. Given that Intrusion has higher upside potential than Fiserv, analysts believe Intrusion is more attractive than Fiserv.

Intrusion has a beta of -1.257, which suggesting that the stock is 225.681% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fiserv has a beta of 0.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.68%.

Intrusion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fiserv offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intrusion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fiserv pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intrusion quarterly revenues are $1.7M, which are smaller than Fiserv quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Intrusion's net income of -$2M is lower than Fiserv's net income of $938M. Notably, Intrusion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fiserv's PE ratio is 36.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intrusion is 1.12x versus 5.65x for Fiserv. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intellinetics has a net margin of -116.77% compared to Intrusion's net margin of -1.26%. Intrusion's return on equity of -3738% beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -5.34%.

Intrusion has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 500.57%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $17.50 which suggests that it could grow by 27.74%. Given that Intrusion has higher upside potential than Intellinetics, analysts believe Intrusion is more attractive than Intellinetics.

Intrusion has a beta of -1.257, which suggesting that the stock is 225.681% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.627, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.332%.

Intrusion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intrusion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intrusion quarterly revenues are $1.7M, which are smaller than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.3M. Intrusion's net income of -$2M is lower than Intellinetics's net income of -$53.7K. Notably, Intrusion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intrusion is 1.12x versus 3.29x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Signing Day Sports has a net margin of -116.77% compared to Intrusion's net margin of -2893.73%. Intrusion's return on equity of -3738% beat Signing Day Sports's return on equity of --.

Intrusion has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 500.57%. On the other hand Signing Day Sports has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Intrusion has higher upside potential than Signing Day Sports, analysts believe Intrusion is more attractive than Signing Day Sports.

Intrusion has a beta of -1.257, which suggesting that the stock is 225.681% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Signing Day Sports has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Intrusion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Signing Day Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intrusion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Signing Day Sports pays out -14.6% of its earnings as a dividend.

Intrusion quarterly revenues are $1.7M, which are larger than Signing Day Sports quarterly revenues of $55.4K. Intrusion's net income of -$2M is lower than Signing Day Sports's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Intrusion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Signing Day Sports's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intrusion is 1.12x versus 0.40x for Signing Day Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of -116.77% compared to Intrusion's net margin of -1.23%. Intrusion's return on equity of -3738% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

Intrusion has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 500.57%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 122.6%. Given that Intrusion has higher upside potential than WidePoint, analysts believe Intrusion is more attractive than WidePoint.

Intrusion has a beta of -1.257, which suggesting that the stock is 225.681% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.832, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.194%.

Intrusion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intrusion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intrusion quarterly revenues are $1.7M, which are smaller than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Intrusion's net income of -$2M is lower than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, Intrusion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intrusion is 1.12x versus 0.20x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.