INTA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Microsoft has a net margin of -3.81% compared to Intapp's net margin of 37.61%. Intapp's return on equity of -5.44% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 35.68%.

Intapp has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2.29%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $508.55 which suggests that it could grow by 16.08%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Intapp, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Intapp.

Intapp has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.139%.

Intapp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Intapp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intapp quarterly revenues are $118.8M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $65.6B. Intapp's net income of -$4.5M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.7B. Notably, Intapp's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 36.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intapp is 11.11x versus 12.88x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paylocity Holding has a net margin of -3.81% compared to Intapp's net margin of 10.87%. Intapp's return on equity of -5.44% beat Paylocity Holding's return on equity of 20.2%.

Intapp has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2.29%. On the other hand Paylocity Holding has an analysts' consensus of $213.64 which suggests that it could grow by 6.5%. Given that Paylocity Holding has higher upside potential than Intapp, analysts believe Paylocity Holding is more attractive than Intapp.

Intapp has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paylocity Holding has a beta of 0.924, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.638%.

Intapp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paylocity Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intapp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paylocity Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intapp quarterly revenues are $118.8M, which are smaller than Paylocity Holding quarterly revenues of $317.6M. Intapp's net income of -$4.5M is lower than Paylocity Holding's net income of $34.5M. Notably, Intapp's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paylocity Holding's PE ratio is 55.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intapp is 11.11x versus 8.14x for Paylocity Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PTC has a net margin of -3.81% compared to Intapp's net margin of 20.19%. Intapp's return on equity of -5.44% beat PTC's return on equity of 12.84%.

Intapp has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2.29%. On the other hand PTC has an analysts' consensus of $211.67 which suggests that it could grow by 13.85%. Given that PTC has higher upside potential than Intapp, analysts believe PTC is more attractive than Intapp.

Intapp has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PTC has a beta of 1.161, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.064%.

Intapp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PTC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intapp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PTC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intapp quarterly revenues are $118.8M, which are smaller than PTC quarterly revenues of $626.5M. Intapp's net income of -$4.5M is lower than PTC's net income of $126.5M. Notably, Intapp's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PTC's PE ratio is 59.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intapp is 11.11x versus 9.77x for PTC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPS Commerce has a net margin of -3.81% compared to Intapp's net margin of 14.33%. Intapp's return on equity of -5.44% beat SPS Commerce's return on equity of 11.18%.

Intapp has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2.29%. On the other hand SPS Commerce has an analysts' consensus of $204.56 which suggests that it could grow by 17.58%. Given that SPS Commerce has higher upside potential than Intapp, analysts believe SPS Commerce is more attractive than Intapp.

Intapp has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPS Commerce has a beta of 0.865, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.527%.

Intapp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SPS Commerce offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intapp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPS Commerce pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intapp quarterly revenues are $118.8M, which are smaller than SPS Commerce quarterly revenues of $163.7M. Intapp's net income of -$4.5M is lower than SPS Commerce's net income of $23.5M. Notably, Intapp's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPS Commerce's PE ratio is 90.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intapp is 11.11x versus 11.69x for SPS Commerce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.