Why Did Bill Ackman Buy Alphabet Stock?
Bill Ackman has become famous in the investing world for…
Sell
42
IAS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$7.15
Seasonality move
:
6.73%
Day range:
$6.83 - $7.16
52-week range:
$6.26 - $13.62
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
31.04x
P/S ratio:
2.21x
P/B ratio:
1.16x
Volume:
757.1K
Avg. volume:
1.2M
1-year change:
-30.08%
Market cap:
$1.2B
Revenue:
$530.1M
EPS (TTM):
$0.23
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAS
Integral Ad Science Holding
|
$143.5M | $0.19 | 12.81% | 312.5% | $13.80 |
|
ACCS
ACCESS Newswire
|
$6.2M | $0.19 | -15.04% | -- | $14.00 |
|
CMGO
CMG Holdings Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCHX
Marchex
|
$12.4M | -$0.01 | 1.62% | -33.33% | $4.00 |
|
NCMI
National CineMedia
|
$61.3M | -$0.04 | -6.06% | -36.11% | $7.50 |
|
WRMA
Wiremedia
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAS
Integral Ad Science Holding
|
$7.14 | $13.80 | $1.2B | 31.04x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.21x |
|
ACCS
ACCESS Newswire
|
$8.45 | $14.00 | $32.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.40x |
|
CMGO
CMG Holdings Group
|
$0.0015 | -- | $636.1K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.25x |
|
MCHX
Marchex
|
$1.49 | $4.00 | $65.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.48x |
|
NCMI
National CineMedia
|
$5.90 | $7.50 | $561.7M | 2.57x | $0.03 | 0.51% | 2.35x |
|
WRMA
Wiremedia
|
$0.0010 | -- | $226.2K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAS
Integral Ad Science Holding
|
3.28% | 1.133 | 2.01% | 2.58x |
|
ACCS
ACCESS Newswire
|
38.71% | 1.047 | 46.42% | 0.58x |
|
CMGO
CMG Holdings Group
|
63.73% | 2.655 | 99.67% | 1.31x |
|
MCHX
Marchex
|
-- | 1.724 | -- | 2.14x |
|
NCMI
National CineMedia
|
2.37% | 1.828 | 1.57% | 2.33x |
|
WRMA
Wiremedia
|
-- | 2.949 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAS
Integral Ad Science Holding
|
$119.7M | $30.2M | 3.61% | 3.96% | 16.67% | $57.6M |
|
ACCS
ACCESS Newswire
|
$1.3M | -$2.6M | -21.1% | -32.41% | -1137.6% | $806K |
|
CMGO
CMG Holdings Group
|
$11.3K | -$147.8K | -3.23% | -8.01% | -733.23% | -$102.8K |
|
MCHX
Marchex
|
$7.5M | -$1.6M | -14.38% | -14.38% | -13.31% | $710K |
|
NCMI
National CineMedia
|
$53.4M | $19.9M | -5.38% | -5.52% | 29.32% | $28.1M |
|
WRMA
Wiremedia
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Integral Ad Science Holding vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns IAS or ACCS?
ACCESS Newswire has a net margin of 9.98% compared to Integral Ad Science Holding's net margin of -700.69%. Integral Ad Science Holding's return on equity of 3.96% beat ACCESS Newswire's return on equity of -32.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IASIntegral Ad Science Holding78.22% $0.09 $1B ACCSACCESS Newswire89.62% -$2.66 $41.2M -
What do Analysts Say About IAS or ACCS?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a consensus price target of $13.80, signalling upside risk potential of 93.34%. On the other hand ACCESS Newswire has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 65.73%. Given that Integral Ad Science Holding has higher upside potential than ACCESS Newswire, analysts believe Integral Ad Science Holding is more attractive than ACCESS Newswire.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IASIntegral Ad Science Holding8 6 0 ACCSACCESS Newswire2 0 0 -
Is IAS or ACCS More Risky?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ACCESS Newswire has a beta of 0.707, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.345%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAS or ACCS?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ACCESS Newswire offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Integral Ad Science Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ACCESS Newswire pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAS or ACCS?
Integral Ad Science Holding quarterly revenues are $153M, which are larger than ACCESS Newswire quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Integral Ad Science Holding's net income of $15.3M is higher than ACCESS Newswire's net income of -$10.2M. Notably, Integral Ad Science Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.04x while ACCESS Newswire's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Integral Ad Science Holding is 2.21x versus 1.40x for ACCESS Newswire. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IASIntegral Ad Science Holding2.21x 31.04x $153M $15.3M ACCSACCESS Newswire1.40x -- $1.5M -$10.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns IAS or CMGO?
CMG Holdings Group has a net margin of 9.98% compared to Integral Ad Science Holding's net margin of -817.39%. Integral Ad Science Holding's return on equity of 3.96% beat CMG Holdings Group's return on equity of -8.01%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IASIntegral Ad Science Holding78.22% $0.09 $1B CMGOCMG Holdings Group76.42% -$0.00 $1.2M -
What do Analysts Say About IAS or CMGO?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a consensus price target of $13.80, signalling upside risk potential of 93.34%. On the other hand CMG Holdings Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 53003.45%. Given that CMG Holdings Group has higher upside potential than Integral Ad Science Holding, analysts believe CMG Holdings Group is more attractive than Integral Ad Science Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IASIntegral Ad Science Holding8 6 0 CMGOCMG Holdings Group0 0 0 -
Is IAS or CMGO More Risky?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CMG Holdings Group has a beta of 1.109, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.891%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAS or CMGO?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CMG Holdings Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Integral Ad Science Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CMG Holdings Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAS or CMGO?
Integral Ad Science Holding quarterly revenues are $153M, which are larger than CMG Holdings Group quarterly revenues of $14.8K. Integral Ad Science Holding's net income of $15.3M is higher than CMG Holdings Group's net income of -$121K. Notably, Integral Ad Science Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.04x while CMG Holdings Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Integral Ad Science Holding is 2.21x versus 0.25x for CMG Holdings Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IASIntegral Ad Science Holding2.21x 31.04x $153M $15.3M CMGOCMG Holdings Group0.25x -- $14.8K -$121K
-
Which has Higher Returns IAS or MCHX?
Marchex has a net margin of 9.98% compared to Integral Ad Science Holding's net margin of -16.02%. Integral Ad Science Holding's return on equity of 3.96% beat Marchex's return on equity of -14.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IASIntegral Ad Science Holding78.22% $0.09 $1B MCHXMarchex63.24% -$0.04 $32.6M -
What do Analysts Say About IAS or MCHX?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a consensus price target of $13.80, signalling upside risk potential of 93.34%. On the other hand Marchex has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 168.46%. Given that Marchex has higher upside potential than Integral Ad Science Holding, analysts believe Marchex is more attractive than Integral Ad Science Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IASIntegral Ad Science Holding8 6 0 MCHXMarchex1 0 0 -
Is IAS or MCHX More Risky?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marchex has a beta of 1.714, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.442%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAS or MCHX?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marchex offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Integral Ad Science Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marchex pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAS or MCHX?
Integral Ad Science Holding quarterly revenues are $153M, which are larger than Marchex quarterly revenues of $11.9M. Integral Ad Science Holding's net income of $15.3M is higher than Marchex's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Integral Ad Science Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.04x while Marchex's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Integral Ad Science Holding is 2.21x versus 1.48x for Marchex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IASIntegral Ad Science Holding2.21x 31.04x $153M $15.3M MCHXMarchex1.48x -- $11.9M -$1.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns IAS or NCMI?
National CineMedia has a net margin of 9.98% compared to Integral Ad Science Holding's net margin of 28.62%. Integral Ad Science Holding's return on equity of 3.96% beat National CineMedia's return on equity of -5.52%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IASIntegral Ad Science Holding78.22% $0.09 $1B NCMINational CineMedia61.88% $0.26 $421.2M -
What do Analysts Say About IAS or NCMI?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a consensus price target of $13.80, signalling upside risk potential of 93.34%. On the other hand National CineMedia has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 27.12%. Given that Integral Ad Science Holding has higher upside potential than National CineMedia, analysts believe Integral Ad Science Holding is more attractive than National CineMedia.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IASIntegral Ad Science Holding8 6 0 NCMINational CineMedia3 0 0 -
Is IAS or NCMI More Risky?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National CineMedia has a beta of 1.931, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.106%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAS or NCMI?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. National CineMedia offers a yield of 0.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Integral Ad Science Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. National CineMedia pays out -1.35% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAS or NCMI?
Integral Ad Science Holding quarterly revenues are $153M, which are larger than National CineMedia quarterly revenues of $86.3M. Integral Ad Science Holding's net income of $15.3M is lower than National CineMedia's net income of $24.7M. Notably, Integral Ad Science Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.04x while National CineMedia's PE ratio is 2.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Integral Ad Science Holding is 2.21x versus 2.35x for National CineMedia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IASIntegral Ad Science Holding2.21x 31.04x $153M $15.3M NCMINational CineMedia2.35x 2.57x $86.3M $24.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns IAS or WRMA?
Wiremedia has a net margin of 9.98% compared to Integral Ad Science Holding's net margin of --. Integral Ad Science Holding's return on equity of 3.96% beat Wiremedia's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IASIntegral Ad Science Holding78.22% $0.09 $1B WRMAWiremedia-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IAS or WRMA?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a consensus price target of $13.80, signalling upside risk potential of 93.34%. On the other hand Wiremedia has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Integral Ad Science Holding has higher upside potential than Wiremedia, analysts believe Integral Ad Science Holding is more attractive than Wiremedia.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IASIntegral Ad Science Holding8 6 0 WRMAWiremedia0 0 0 -
Is IAS or WRMA More Risky?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wiremedia has a beta of -16.156, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1715.587%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAS or WRMA?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wiremedia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Integral Ad Science Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wiremedia pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAS or WRMA?
Integral Ad Science Holding quarterly revenues are $153M, which are larger than Wiremedia quarterly revenues of --. Integral Ad Science Holding's net income of $15.3M is higher than Wiremedia's net income of --. Notably, Integral Ad Science Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.04x while Wiremedia's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Integral Ad Science Holding is 2.21x versus -- for Wiremedia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IASIntegral Ad Science Holding2.21x 31.04x $153M $15.3M WRMAWiremedia-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Did Bill Ackman Buy Brookfield Stock?
Bill Ackman of Pershing Square Capital has made a number…
Why Is Chewy Stock Up — And Will It Keep Climbing?
We are all witnesses to the crazy e-commerce industry boom…
Stock Ideas
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
27
SAIA alert for Apr 26
Saia [SAIA] is down 30.77% over the past day.
Sell
48
APPF alert for Apr 26
AppFolio [APPF] is down 18.16% over the past day.
Sell
15
KNSL alert for Apr 26
Kinsale Capital Group [KNSL] is down 16.33% over the past day.
