HYFM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Art's-Way Manufacturing has a net margin of -29.87% compared to Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net margin of -0.5%. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity of -23.5% beat Art's-Way Manufacturing's return on equity of -7.61%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.7%. On the other hand Art's-Way Manufacturing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 351.61%. Given that Art's-Way Manufacturing has higher upside potential than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, analysts believe Art's-Way Manufacturing is more attractive than Hydrofarm Holdings Group.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Art's-Way Manufacturing has a beta of 0.404, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.637%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Art's-Way Manufacturing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hydrofarm Holdings Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Art's-Way Manufacturing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group quarterly revenues are $44M, which are larger than Art's-Way Manufacturing quarterly revenues of $6.7M. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net income of -$13.1M is lower than Art's-Way Manufacturing's net income of -$33.3K. Notably, Hydrofarm Holdings Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Art's-Way Manufacturing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hydrofarm Holdings Group is 0.14x versus 0.31x for Art's-Way Manufacturing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CEA Industries has a net margin of -29.87% compared to Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net margin of -189.45%. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity of -23.5% beat CEA Industries's return on equity of -26.82%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.7%. On the other hand CEA Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hydrofarm Holdings Group has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe Hydrofarm Holdings Group is more attractive than CEA Industries.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CEA Industries has a beta of 1.033, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.25%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CEA Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hydrofarm Holdings Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CEA Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group quarterly revenues are $44M, which are larger than CEA Industries quarterly revenues of $390.8K. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net income of -$13.1M is lower than CEA Industries's net income of -$740.4K. Notably, Hydrofarm Holdings Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CEA Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hydrofarm Holdings Group is 0.14x versus 2.15x for CEA Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nikola has a net margin of -29.87% compared to Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net margin of -793.38%. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity of -23.5% beat Nikola's return on equity of -112.88%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.7%. On the other hand Nikola has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 964.38%. Given that Nikola has higher upside potential than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, analysts believe Nikola is more attractive than Hydrofarm Holdings Group.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nikola has a beta of 1.920, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.977%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nikola offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hydrofarm Holdings Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nikola pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group quarterly revenues are $44M, which are larger than Nikola quarterly revenues of $25.2M. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net income of -$13.1M is higher than Nikola's net income of -$199.8M. Notably, Hydrofarm Holdings Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nikola's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hydrofarm Holdings Group is 0.14x versus 0.69x for Nikola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban-gro has a net margin of -29.87% compared to Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net margin of -13.78%. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity of -23.5% beat Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.7%. On the other hand Urban-gro has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hydrofarm Holdings Group has higher upside potential than Urban-gro, analysts believe Hydrofarm Holdings Group is more attractive than Urban-gro.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban-gro has a beta of 1.667, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.652%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban-gro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hydrofarm Holdings Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban-gro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group quarterly revenues are $44M, which are larger than Urban-gro quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net income of -$13.1M is lower than Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Hydrofarm Holdings Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Urban-gro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hydrofarm Holdings Group is 0.14x versus 0.18x for Urban-gro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.