GSHD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Progressive has a net margin of 9.69% compared to Goosehead Insurance's net margin of 11.84%. Goosehead Insurance's return on equity of 288.18% beat Progressive's return on equity of 36.88%.

Goosehead Insurance has a consensus price target of $110.10, signalling upside risk potential of 6.15%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $277.8235 which suggests that it could grow by 14.05%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than Goosehead Insurance, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than Goosehead Insurance.

Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 1.411, which suggesting that the stock is 41.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.411, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.864%.

Goosehead Insurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Progressive offers a yield of 0.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.60 per share. Goosehead Insurance pays 77.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 7.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goosehead Insurance quarterly revenues are $78M, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $19.7B. Goosehead Insurance's net income of $7.6M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.3B. Notably, Goosehead Insurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 144.06x while Progressive's PE ratio is 17.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goosehead Insurance is 12.78x versus 1.99x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of 9.69% compared to Goosehead Insurance's net margin of 8.89%. Goosehead Insurance's return on equity of 288.18% beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 9.26%.

Goosehead Insurance has a consensus price target of $110.10, signalling upside risk potential of 6.15%. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -12.85%. Given that Goosehead Insurance has higher upside potential than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe Goosehead Insurance is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 1.411, which suggesting that the stock is 41.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.203, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.686%.

Goosehead Insurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 4.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Goosehead Insurance pays 77.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 282.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Goosehead Insurance's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Safety Insurance Group's is not.

Goosehead Insurance quarterly revenues are $78M, which are smaller than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $291.1M. Goosehead Insurance's net income of $7.6M is lower than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $25.9M. Notably, Goosehead Insurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 144.06x while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 15.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goosehead Insurance is 12.78x versus 1.09x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Selective Insurance Group has a net margin of 9.69% compared to Goosehead Insurance's net margin of 7.42%. Goosehead Insurance's return on equity of 288.18% beat Selective Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.04%.

Goosehead Insurance has a consensus price target of $110.10, signalling upside risk potential of 6.15%. On the other hand Selective Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $104.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.26%. Given that Selective Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Goosehead Insurance, analysts believe Selective Insurance Group is more attractive than Goosehead Insurance.

Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 1.411, which suggesting that the stock is 41.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Selective Insurance Group has a beta of 0.624, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.633%.

Goosehead Insurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Selective Insurance Group offers a yield of 1.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Goosehead Insurance pays 77.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Selective Insurance Group pays out 22.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goosehead Insurance quarterly revenues are $78M, which are smaller than Selective Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Goosehead Insurance's net income of $7.6M is lower than Selective Insurance Group's net income of $92.3M. Notably, Goosehead Insurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 144.06x while Selective Insurance Group's PE ratio is 24.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goosehead Insurance is 12.78x versus 1.18x for Selective Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Fire Group has a net margin of 9.69% compared to Goosehead Insurance's net margin of 6.12%. Goosehead Insurance's return on equity of 288.18% beat United Fire Group's return on equity of 6.91%.

Goosehead Insurance has a consensus price target of $110.10, signalling upside risk potential of 6.15%. On the other hand United Fire Group has an analysts' consensus of $26.00 which suggests that it could fall by -3.99%. Given that Goosehead Insurance has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, analysts believe Goosehead Insurance is more attractive than United Fire Group.

Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 1.411, which suggesting that the stock is 41.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Fire Group has a beta of 0.542, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.808%.

Goosehead Insurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. United Fire Group offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Goosehead Insurance pays 77.36% of its earnings as a dividend. United Fire Group pays out -54.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Goosehead Insurance's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goosehead Insurance quarterly revenues are $78M, which are smaller than United Fire Group quarterly revenues of $323M. Goosehead Insurance's net income of $7.6M is lower than United Fire Group's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Goosehead Insurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 144.06x while United Fire Group's PE ratio is 13.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goosehead Insurance is 12.78x versus 0.57x for United Fire Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.