FUNC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Camden National has a net margin of 27.74% compared to First United's net margin of 31.72%. First United's return on equity of 13.08% beat Camden National's return on equity of 10.33%.

First United has a consensus price target of $42.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.37%. On the other hand Camden National has an analysts' consensus of $50.00 which suggests that it could grow by 29.07%. Given that First United has higher upside potential than Camden National, analysts believe First United is more attractive than Camden National.

First United has a beta of 0.584, which suggesting that the stock is 41.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Camden National has a beta of 0.608, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.17%.

First United has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Camden National offers a yield of 4.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. First United pays 26.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Camden National pays out 46.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First United quarterly revenues are $20.9M, which are smaller than Camden National quarterly revenues of $46.2M. First United's net income of $5.8M is lower than Camden National's net income of $14.7M. Notably, First United's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.54x while Camden National's PE ratio is 10.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First United is 2.35x versus 3.28x for Camden National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Midland States Bancorp has a net margin of 27.74% compared to First United's net margin of -69.5%. First United's return on equity of 13.08% beat Midland States Bancorp's return on equity of -1.71%.

First United has a consensus price target of $42.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.37%. On the other hand Midland States Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $20.63 which suggests that it could grow by 24.17%. Given that First United has higher upside potential than Midland States Bancorp, analysts believe First United is more attractive than Midland States Bancorp.

First United has a beta of 0.584, which suggesting that the stock is 41.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Midland States Bancorp has a beta of 0.579, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.111%.

First United has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Midland States Bancorp offers a yield of 7.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. First United pays 26.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Midland States Bancorp pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. First United's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First United quarterly revenues are $20.9M, which are smaller than Midland States Bancorp quarterly revenues of $75.6M. First United's net income of $5.8M is higher than Midland States Bancorp's net income of -$52.5M. Notably, First United's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.54x while Midland States Bancorp's PE ratio is 10.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First United is 2.35x versus 1.22x for Midland States Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 27.74% compared to First United's net margin of 25.81%. First United's return on equity of 13.08% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.27%.

First United has a consensus price target of $42.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.37%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $76.50 which suggests that it could grow by 29.18%. Given that First United has higher upside potential than Tompkins Financial, analysts believe First United is more attractive than Tompkins Financial.

First United has a beta of 0.584, which suggesting that the stock is 41.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.748, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.208%.

First United has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 4.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. First United pays 26.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First United quarterly revenues are $20.9M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $76.2M. First United's net income of $5.8M is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, First United's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.54x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 11.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First United is 2.35x versus 2.86x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Western Alliance Bancorp has a net margin of 27.74% compared to First United's net margin of 25.59%. First United's return on equity of 13.08% beat Western Alliance Bancorp's return on equity of 12.23%.

First United has a consensus price target of $42.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.37%. On the other hand Western Alliance Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $92.36 which suggests that it could grow by 32.51%. Given that First United has higher upside potential than Western Alliance Bancorp, analysts believe First United is more attractive than Western Alliance Bancorp.

First United has a beta of 0.584, which suggesting that the stock is 41.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Western Alliance Bancorp has a beta of 1.289, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.929%.

First United has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Western Alliance Bancorp offers a yield of 2.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. First United pays 26.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Western Alliance Bancorp pays out 22.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First United quarterly revenues are $20.9M, which are smaller than Western Alliance Bancorp quarterly revenues of $778M. First United's net income of $5.8M is lower than Western Alliance Bancorp's net income of $199.1M. Notably, First United's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.54x while Western Alliance Bancorp's PE ratio is 9.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First United is 2.35x versus 2.38x for Western Alliance Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.