FTCI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ascent Solar Technologies has a net margin of -151.53% compared to FTC Solar's net margin of -19776.22%. FTC Solar's return on equity of -89.26% beat Ascent Solar Technologies's return on equity of -12974.47%.

FTC Solar has a consensus price target of $6.20, signalling upside risk potential of 125.46%. On the other hand Ascent Solar Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FTC Solar has higher upside potential than Ascent Solar Technologies, analysts believe FTC Solar is more attractive than Ascent Solar Technologies.

FTC Solar has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ascent Solar Technologies has a beta of 2.293, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 129.254%.

FTC Solar has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ascent Solar Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FTC Solar pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ascent Solar Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FTC Solar quarterly revenues are $10.1M, which are larger than Ascent Solar Technologies quarterly revenues of $8.6K. FTC Solar's net income of -$15.4M is lower than Ascent Solar Technologies's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, FTC Solar's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ascent Solar Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTC Solar is 0.60x versus 4.58x for Ascent Solar Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enphase Energy has a net margin of -151.53% compared to FTC Solar's net margin of 16.24%. FTC Solar's return on equity of -89.26% beat Enphase Energy's return on equity of 11.27%.

FTC Solar has a consensus price target of $6.20, signalling upside risk potential of 125.46%. On the other hand Enphase Energy has an analysts' consensus of $79.49 which suggests that it could grow by 27.41%. Given that FTC Solar has higher upside potential than Enphase Energy, analysts believe FTC Solar is more attractive than Enphase Energy.

FTC Solar has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enphase Energy has a beta of 1.944, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.439%.

FTC Solar has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enphase Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FTC Solar pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enphase Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FTC Solar quarterly revenues are $10.1M, which are smaller than Enphase Energy quarterly revenues of $382.7M. FTC Solar's net income of -$15.4M is lower than Enphase Energy's net income of $62.2M. Notably, FTC Solar's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Enphase Energy's PE ratio is 84.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTC Solar is 0.60x versus 6.60x for Enphase Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shoals Technologies Group has a net margin of -151.53% compared to FTC Solar's net margin of 7.31%. FTC Solar's return on equity of -89.26% beat Shoals Technologies Group's return on equity of 4.39%.

FTC Solar has a consensus price target of $6.20, signalling upside risk potential of 125.46%. On the other hand Shoals Technologies Group has an analysts' consensus of $6.56 which suggests that it could grow by 101.25%. Given that FTC Solar has higher upside potential than Shoals Technologies Group, analysts believe FTC Solar is more attractive than Shoals Technologies Group.

FTC Solar has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shoals Technologies Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

FTC Solar has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shoals Technologies Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FTC Solar pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shoals Technologies Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FTC Solar quarterly revenues are $10.1M, which are smaller than Shoals Technologies Group quarterly revenues of $107M. FTC Solar's net income of -$15.4M is lower than Shoals Technologies Group's net income of $7.8M. Notably, FTC Solar's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Shoals Technologies Group's PE ratio is 21.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTC Solar is 0.60x versus 1.38x for Shoals Technologies Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zeo Energy has a net margin of -151.53% compared to FTC Solar's net margin of 1.14%. FTC Solar's return on equity of -89.26% beat Zeo Energy's return on equity of 9.69%.

FTC Solar has a consensus price target of $6.20, signalling upside risk potential of 125.46%. On the other hand Zeo Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FTC Solar has higher upside potential than Zeo Energy, analysts believe FTC Solar is more attractive than Zeo Energy.

FTC Solar has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zeo Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

FTC Solar has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zeo Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FTC Solar pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zeo Energy pays out 83.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Zeo Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FTC Solar quarterly revenues are $10.1M, which are smaller than Zeo Energy quarterly revenues of $14.7M. FTC Solar's net income of -$15.4M is lower than Zeo Energy's net income of $167.2K. Notably, FTC Solar's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zeo Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTC Solar is 0.60x versus 0.06x for Zeo Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.