FNKO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jakks Pacific has a net margin of -0.51% compared to Funko's net margin of -6.97%. Funko's return on equity of -6.35% beat Jakks Pacific's return on equity of 15.92%.

Funko has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.38%. On the other hand Jakks Pacific has an analysts' consensus of $43.00 which suggests that it could grow by 75.08%. Given that Jakks Pacific has higher upside potential than Funko, analysts believe Jakks Pacific is more attractive than Funko.

Funko has a beta of 0.943, which suggesting that the stock is 5.651% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jakks Pacific has a beta of 2.147, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 114.673%.

Funko has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jakks Pacific offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Funko pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jakks Pacific pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Funko quarterly revenues are $293.7M, which are larger than Jakks Pacific quarterly revenues of $130.7M. Funko's net income of -$1.5M is higher than Jakks Pacific's net income of -$9.1M. Notably, Funko's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Jakks Pacific's PE ratio is 8.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Funko is 0.33x versus 0.40x for Jakks Pacific. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kontoor Brands has a net margin of -0.51% compared to Funko's net margin of 9.15%. Funko's return on equity of -6.35% beat Kontoor Brands's return on equity of 65.26%.

Funko has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.38%. On the other hand Kontoor Brands has an analysts' consensus of $82.00 which suggests that it could grow by 28.55%. Given that Funko has higher upside potential than Kontoor Brands, analysts believe Funko is more attractive than Kontoor Brands.

Funko has a beta of 0.943, which suggesting that the stock is 5.651% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kontoor Brands has a beta of 1.234, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.449%.

Funko has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kontoor Brands offers a yield of 3.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Funko pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kontoor Brands pays out 45.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Kontoor Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Funko quarterly revenues are $293.7M, which are smaller than Kontoor Brands quarterly revenues of $699.3M. Funko's net income of -$1.5M is lower than Kontoor Brands's net income of $64M. Notably, Funko's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kontoor Brands's PE ratio is 14.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Funko is 0.33x versus 1.38x for Kontoor Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mattel has a net margin of -0.51% compared to Funko's net margin of 8.56%. Funko's return on equity of -6.35% beat Mattel's return on equity of 25.26%.

Funko has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.38%. On the other hand Mattel has an analysts' consensus of $25.58 which suggests that it could grow by 32.52%. Given that Funko has higher upside potential than Mattel, analysts believe Funko is more attractive than Mattel.

Funko has a beta of 0.943, which suggesting that the stock is 5.651% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel has a beta of 0.655, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.545%.

Funko has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mattel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Funko pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Funko quarterly revenues are $293.7M, which are smaller than Mattel quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Funko's net income of -$1.5M is lower than Mattel's net income of $140.9M. Notably, Funko's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mattel's PE ratio is 12.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Funko is 0.33x versus 1.23x for Mattel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reynolds Consumer Products has a net margin of -0.51% compared to Funko's net margin of 11.86%. Funko's return on equity of -6.35% beat Reynolds Consumer Products's return on equity of 17.27%.

Funko has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.38%. On the other hand Reynolds Consumer Products has an analysts' consensus of $29.56 which suggests that it could grow by 22.78%. Given that Funko has higher upside potential than Reynolds Consumer Products, analysts believe Funko is more attractive than Reynolds Consumer Products.

Funko has a beta of 0.943, which suggesting that the stock is 5.651% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reynolds Consumer Products has a beta of 0.556, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.439%.

Funko has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Reynolds Consumer Products offers a yield of 3.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Funko pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Reynolds Consumer Products pays out 54.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Reynolds Consumer Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Funko quarterly revenues are $293.7M, which are smaller than Reynolds Consumer Products quarterly revenues of $1B. Funko's net income of -$1.5M is lower than Reynolds Consumer Products's net income of $121M. Notably, Funko's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Reynolds Consumer Products's PE ratio is 14.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Funko is 0.33x versus 1.36x for Reynolds Consumer Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.