FCFS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EZCORP has a net margin of 7.74% compared to FirstCash Holdings's net margin of 5.16%. FirstCash Holdings's return on equity of 12.32% beat EZCORP's return on equity of 10.58%.

FirstCash Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 31.48%. On the other hand EZCORP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 34.64%. Given that EZCORP has higher upside potential than FirstCash Holdings, analysts believe EZCORP is more attractive than FirstCash Holdings.

FirstCash Holdings has a beta of 0.652, which suggesting that the stock is 34.832% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EZCORP has a beta of 1.050, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.01%.

FirstCash Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. EZCORP offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FirstCash Holdings pays 28.22% of its earnings as a dividend. EZCORP pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FirstCash Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FirstCash Holdings quarterly revenues are $837.3M, which are larger than EZCORP quarterly revenues of $294.6M. FirstCash Holdings's net income of $64.8M is higher than EZCORP's net income of $15.2M. Notably, FirstCash Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.04x while EZCORP's PE ratio is 10.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FirstCash Holdings is 1.39x versus 0.85x for EZCORP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Old Market Capital has a net margin of 7.74% compared to FirstCash Holdings's net margin of -13.48%. FirstCash Holdings's return on equity of 12.32% beat Old Market Capital's return on equity of -25.87%.

FirstCash Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 31.48%. On the other hand Old Market Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FirstCash Holdings has higher upside potential than Old Market Capital, analysts believe FirstCash Holdings is more attractive than Old Market Capital.

FirstCash Holdings has a beta of 0.652, which suggesting that the stock is 34.832% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Old Market Capital has a beta of 0.939, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.082%.

FirstCash Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. Old Market Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FirstCash Holdings pays 28.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Old Market Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FirstCash Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FirstCash Holdings quarterly revenues are $837.3M, which are larger than Old Market Capital quarterly revenues of $3.3M. FirstCash Holdings's net income of $64.8M is higher than Old Market Capital's net income of -$451K. Notably, FirstCash Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.04x while Old Market Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FirstCash Holdings is 1.39x versus -- for Old Market Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SLM has a net margin of 7.74% compared to FirstCash Holdings's net margin of -11.76%. FirstCash Holdings's return on equity of 12.32% beat SLM's return on equity of 32.57%.

FirstCash Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 31.48%. On the other hand SLM has an analysts' consensus of $30.17 which suggests that it could grow by 8.55%. Given that FirstCash Holdings has higher upside potential than SLM, analysts believe FirstCash Holdings is more attractive than SLM.

FirstCash Holdings has a beta of 0.652, which suggesting that the stock is 34.832% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SLM has a beta of 1.215, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.467%.

FirstCash Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. SLM offers a yield of 1.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. FirstCash Holdings pays 28.22% of its earnings as a dividend. SLM pays out 20.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FirstCash Holdings quarterly revenues are $837.3M, which are larger than SLM quarterly revenues of $383.9M. FirstCash Holdings's net income of $64.8M is higher than SLM's net income of -$45.2M. Notably, FirstCash Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.04x while SLM's PE ratio is 9.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FirstCash Holdings is 1.39x versus 3.24x for SLM. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

World Acceptance has a net margin of 7.74% compared to FirstCash Holdings's net margin of 18.3%. FirstCash Holdings's return on equity of 12.32% beat World Acceptance's return on equity of 20.13%.

FirstCash Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 31.48%. On the other hand World Acceptance has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.24%. Given that FirstCash Holdings has higher upside potential than World Acceptance, analysts believe FirstCash Holdings is more attractive than World Acceptance.

FirstCash Holdings has a beta of 0.652, which suggesting that the stock is 34.832% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison World Acceptance has a beta of 1.419, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.866%.

FirstCash Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. World Acceptance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FirstCash Holdings pays 28.22% of its earnings as a dividend. World Acceptance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FirstCash Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FirstCash Holdings quarterly revenues are $837.3M, which are larger than World Acceptance quarterly revenues of $121M. FirstCash Holdings's net income of $64.8M is higher than World Acceptance's net income of $22.1M. Notably, FirstCash Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.04x while World Acceptance's PE ratio is 7.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FirstCash Holdings is 1.39x versus 1.20x for World Acceptance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.