ERII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mueller Water Products has a net margin of 21.98% compared to Energy Recovery's net margin of 2.87%. Energy Recovery's return on equity of 8.96% beat Mueller Water Products's return on equity of 15.25%.

Energy Recovery has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 37.05%. On the other hand Mueller Water Products has an analysts' consensus of $18.33 which suggests that it could grow by 14.79%. Given that Energy Recovery has higher upside potential than Mueller Water Products, analysts believe Energy Recovery is more attractive than Mueller Water Products.

Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.249% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mueller Water Products has a beta of 1.372, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.202%.

Energy Recovery has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mueller Water Products offers a yield of 1.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Energy Recovery pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Water Products pays out 34.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Water Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Recovery quarterly revenues are $38.6M, which are smaller than Mueller Water Products quarterly revenues of $348.2M. Energy Recovery's net income of $8.5M is lower than Mueller Water Products's net income of $10M. Notably, Energy Recovery's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.53x while Mueller Water Products's PE ratio is 31.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Recovery is 6.46x versus 2.74x for Mueller Water Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tennant has a net margin of 21.98% compared to Energy Recovery's net margin of 6.59%. Energy Recovery's return on equity of 8.96% beat Tennant's return on equity of 17.93%.

Energy Recovery has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 37.05%. On the other hand Tennant has an analysts' consensus of $128.00 which suggests that it could grow by 59.42%. Given that Tennant has higher upside potential than Energy Recovery, analysts believe Tennant is more attractive than Energy Recovery.

Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.249% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tennant has a beta of 1.001, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.061%.

Energy Recovery has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tennant offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Energy Recovery pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tennant pays out 18.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Tennant's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Recovery quarterly revenues are $38.6M, which are smaller than Tennant quarterly revenues of $315.8M. Energy Recovery's net income of $8.5M is lower than Tennant's net income of $20.8M. Notably, Energy Recovery's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.53x while Tennant's PE ratio is 14.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Recovery is 6.46x versus 1.21x for Tennant. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Watts Water Technologies has a net margin of 21.98% compared to Energy Recovery's net margin of 12.71%. Energy Recovery's return on equity of 8.96% beat Watts Water Technologies's return on equity of 17.85%.

Energy Recovery has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 37.05%. On the other hand Watts Water Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4.12%. Given that Energy Recovery has higher upside potential than Watts Water Technologies, analysts believe Energy Recovery is more attractive than Watts Water Technologies.

Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.249% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 0.924, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.569%.

Energy Recovery has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Watts Water Technologies offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Energy Recovery pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Watts Water Technologies pays out 17.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Watts Water Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Recovery quarterly revenues are $38.6M, which are smaller than Watts Water Technologies quarterly revenues of $543.6M. Energy Recovery's net income of $8.5M is lower than Watts Water Technologies's net income of $69.1M. Notably, Energy Recovery's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.53x while Watts Water Technologies's PE ratio is 24.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Recovery is 6.46x versus 3.00x for Watts Water Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xylem has a net margin of 21.98% compared to Energy Recovery's net margin of 10.31%. Energy Recovery's return on equity of 8.96% beat Xylem's return on equity of 8.1%.

Energy Recovery has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 37.05%. On the other hand Xylem has an analysts' consensus of $136.36 which suggests that it could grow by 26.1%. Given that Energy Recovery has higher upside potential than Xylem, analysts believe Energy Recovery is more attractive than Xylem.

Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.249% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xylem has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.053%.

Energy Recovery has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xylem offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Energy Recovery pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xylem pays out 49.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Xylem's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Recovery quarterly revenues are $38.6M, which are smaller than Xylem quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Energy Recovery's net income of $8.5M is lower than Xylem's net income of $217M. Notably, Energy Recovery's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.53x while Xylem's PE ratio is 33.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Recovery is 6.46x versus 3.38x for Xylem. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.