ERII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Conair has a net margin of 34.99% compared to Energy Recovery's net margin of --. Energy Recovery's return on equity of 10.49% beat Conair's return on equity of --.

Energy Recovery has a consensus price target of $19.67, signalling upside risk potential of 23.3%. On the other hand Conair has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Energy Recovery has higher upside potential than Conair, analysts believe Energy Recovery is more attractive than Conair.

Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.207, which suggesting that the stock is 20.692% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conair has a beta of -0.834, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 183.363%.

Energy Recovery has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Conair offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Recovery pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Conair pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy Recovery quarterly revenues are $67.1M, which are larger than Conair quarterly revenues of --. Energy Recovery's net income of $23.5M is higher than Conair's net income of --. Notably, Energy Recovery's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.90x while Conair's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Recovery is 6.38x versus -- for Conair. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Donaldson has a net margin of 34.99% compared to Energy Recovery's net margin of 11.02%. Energy Recovery's return on equity of 10.49% beat Donaldson's return on equity of 28.11%.

Energy Recovery has a consensus price target of $19.67, signalling upside risk potential of 23.3%. On the other hand Donaldson has an analysts' consensus of $73.83 which suggests that it could grow by 10.08%. Given that Energy Recovery has higher upside potential than Donaldson, analysts believe Energy Recovery is more attractive than Donaldson.

Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.207, which suggesting that the stock is 20.692% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donaldson has a beta of 1.040, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.969%.

Energy Recovery has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Donaldson offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Energy Recovery pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson pays out 29.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Recovery quarterly revenues are $67.1M, which are smaller than Donaldson quarterly revenues of $870M. Energy Recovery's net income of $23.5M is lower than Donaldson's net income of $95.9M. Notably, Energy Recovery's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.90x while Donaldson's PE ratio is 19.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Recovery is 6.38x versus 2.26x for Donaldson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mueller Water Products has a net margin of 34.99% compared to Energy Recovery's net margin of 11.6%. Energy Recovery's return on equity of 10.49% beat Mueller Water Products's return on equity of 17.46%.

Energy Recovery has a consensus price target of $19.67, signalling upside risk potential of 23.3%. On the other hand Mueller Water Products has an analysts' consensus of $29.17 which suggests that it could grow by 14.33%. Given that Energy Recovery has higher upside potential than Mueller Water Products, analysts believe Energy Recovery is more attractive than Mueller Water Products.

Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.207, which suggesting that the stock is 20.692% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mueller Water Products has a beta of 1.393, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.348%.

Energy Recovery has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mueller Water Products offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Energy Recovery pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Water Products pays out 34.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Water Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Recovery quarterly revenues are $67.1M, which are smaller than Mueller Water Products quarterly revenues of $304.3M. Energy Recovery's net income of $23.5M is lower than Mueller Water Products's net income of $35.3M. Notably, Energy Recovery's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.90x while Mueller Water Products's PE ratio is 29.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Recovery is 6.38x versus 2.94x for Mueller Water Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tennant has a net margin of 34.99% compared to Energy Recovery's net margin of 2.01%. Energy Recovery's return on equity of 10.49% beat Tennant's return on equity of 13.54%.

Energy Recovery has a consensus price target of $19.67, signalling upside risk potential of 23.3%. On the other hand Tennant has an analysts' consensus of $129.33 which suggests that it could grow by 60.05%. Given that Tennant has higher upside potential than Energy Recovery, analysts believe Tennant is more attractive than Energy Recovery.

Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.207, which suggesting that the stock is 20.692% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tennant has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.727%.

Energy Recovery has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tennant offers a yield of 1.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Energy Recovery pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tennant pays out 25.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Tennant's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Recovery quarterly revenues are $67.1M, which are smaller than Tennant quarterly revenues of $328.9M. Energy Recovery's net income of $23.5M is higher than Tennant's net income of $6.6M. Notably, Energy Recovery's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.90x while Tennant's PE ratio is 18.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Recovery is 6.38x versus 1.20x for Tennant. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.