DXLG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abercrombie & Fitch has a net margin of -1.68% compared to Destination XL Group's net margin of 10.92%. Destination XL Group's return on equity of 6.36% beat Abercrombie & Fitch's return on equity of 48.87%.

Destination XL Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 37.62%. On the other hand Abercrombie & Fitch has an analysts' consensus of $184.65 which suggests that it could grow by 19.47%. Given that Destination XL Group has higher upside potential than Abercrombie & Fitch, analysts believe Destination XL Group is more attractive than Abercrombie & Fitch.

Destination XL Group has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.796% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abercrombie & Fitch has a beta of 1.522, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.248%.

Destination XL Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Abercrombie & Fitch offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Destination XL Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Abercrombie & Fitch pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Destination XL Group quarterly revenues are $107.5M, which are smaller than Abercrombie & Fitch quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Destination XL Group's net income of -$1.8M is lower than Abercrombie & Fitch's net income of $132M. Notably, Destination XL Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.53x while Abercrombie & Fitch's PE ratio is 15.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Destination XL Group is 0.27x versus 1.72x for Abercrombie & Fitch. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lands' End has a net margin of -1.68% compared to Destination XL Group's net margin of -0.19%. Destination XL Group's return on equity of 6.36% beat Lands' End's return on equity of -8.88%.

Destination XL Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 37.62%. On the other hand Lands' End has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 45.37%. Given that Lands' End has higher upside potential than Destination XL Group, analysts believe Lands' End is more attractive than Destination XL Group.

Destination XL Group has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.796% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lands' End has a beta of 2.759, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 175.865%.

Destination XL Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lands' End offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Destination XL Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lands' End pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Destination XL Group quarterly revenues are $107.5M, which are smaller than Lands' End quarterly revenues of $318.6M. Destination XL Group's net income of -$1.8M is lower than Lands' End's net income of -$593K. Notably, Destination XL Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.53x while Lands' End's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Destination XL Group is 0.27x versus 0.29x for Lands' End. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ross Stores has a net margin of -1.68% compared to Destination XL Group's net margin of 9.64%. Destination XL Group's return on equity of 6.36% beat Ross Stores's return on equity of 42.62%.

Destination XL Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 37.62%. On the other hand Ross Stores has an analysts' consensus of $161.73 which suggests that it could grow by 13.3%. Given that Destination XL Group has higher upside potential than Ross Stores, analysts believe Destination XL Group is more attractive than Ross Stores.

Destination XL Group has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.796% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ross Stores has a beta of 1.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.501%.

Destination XL Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ross Stores offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Destination XL Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores pays out 24.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Destination XL Group quarterly revenues are $107.5M, which are smaller than Ross Stores quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Destination XL Group's net income of -$1.8M is lower than Ross Stores's net income of $488.8M. Notably, Destination XL Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.53x while Ross Stores's PE ratio is 23.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Destination XL Group is 0.27x versus 2.34x for Ross Stores. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban Outfitters has a net margin of -1.68% compared to Destination XL Group's net margin of 7.56%. Destination XL Group's return on equity of 6.36% beat Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 15.11%.

Destination XL Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 37.62%. On the other hand Urban Outfitters has an analysts' consensus of $44.03 which suggests that it could fall by -14.9%. Given that Destination XL Group has higher upside potential than Urban Outfitters, analysts believe Destination XL Group is more attractive than Urban Outfitters.

Destination XL Group has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.796% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.595, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.524%.

Destination XL Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban Outfitters offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Destination XL Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban Outfitters pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Destination XL Group quarterly revenues are $107.5M, which are smaller than Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Destination XL Group's net income of -$1.8M is lower than Urban Outfitters's net income of $102.9M. Notably, Destination XL Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.53x while Urban Outfitters's PE ratio is 15.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Destination XL Group is 0.27x versus 0.96x for Urban Outfitters. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.