CVLT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blackbaud has a net margin of 6.67% compared to CommVault Systems's net margin of 7.16%. CommVault Systems's return on equity of 74.28% beat Blackbaud's return on equity of 8.12%.

CommVault Systems has a consensus price target of $175.87, signalling upside risk potential of 14.21%. On the other hand Blackbaud has an analysts' consensus of $82.40 which suggests that it could grow by 10.44%. Given that CommVault Systems has higher upside potential than Blackbaud, analysts believe CommVault Systems is more attractive than Blackbaud.

CommVault Systems has a beta of 0.651, which suggesting that the stock is 34.928% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackbaud has a beta of 1.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.272%.

CommVault Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Blackbaud offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CommVault Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Blackbaud pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CommVault Systems quarterly revenues are $233.3M, which are smaller than Blackbaud quarterly revenues of $286.7M. CommVault Systems's net income of $15.6M is lower than Blackbaud's net income of $20.5M. Notably, CommVault Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.98x while Blackbaud's PE ratio is 73.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CommVault Systems is 7.73x versus 3.48x for Blackbaud. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 6.67% compared to CommVault Systems's net margin of 19.59%. CommVault Systems's return on equity of 74.28% beat Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 27.48%.

CommVault Systems has a consensus price target of $175.87, signalling upside risk potential of 14.21%. On the other hand Cadence Design Systems has an analysts' consensus of $320.54 which suggests that it could grow by 7.21%. Given that CommVault Systems has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, analysts believe CommVault Systems is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems.

CommVault Systems has a beta of 0.651, which suggesting that the stock is 34.928% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.036, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.6%.

CommVault Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cadence Design Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CommVault Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cadence Design Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CommVault Systems quarterly revenues are $233.3M, which are smaller than Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues of $1.2B. CommVault Systems's net income of $15.6M is lower than Cadence Design Systems's net income of $238.1M. Notably, CommVault Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.98x while Cadence Design Systems's PE ratio is 78.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CommVault Systems is 7.73x versus 18.77x for Cadence Design Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MicroStrategy has a net margin of 6.67% compared to CommVault Systems's net margin of -293.07%. CommVault Systems's return on equity of 74.28% beat MicroStrategy's return on equity of -16.93%.

CommVault Systems has a consensus price target of $175.87, signalling upside risk potential of 14.21%. On the other hand MicroStrategy has an analysts' consensus of $518.68 which suggests that it could grow by 58.18%. Given that MicroStrategy has higher upside potential than CommVault Systems, analysts believe MicroStrategy is more attractive than CommVault Systems.

CommVault Systems has a beta of 0.651, which suggesting that the stock is 34.928% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MicroStrategy has a beta of 3.248, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 224.843%.

CommVault Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MicroStrategy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CommVault Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MicroStrategy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CommVault Systems quarterly revenues are $233.3M, which are larger than MicroStrategy quarterly revenues of $116.1M. CommVault Systems's net income of $15.6M is higher than MicroStrategy's net income of -$340.2M. Notably, CommVault Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.98x while MicroStrategy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CommVault Systems is 7.73x versus 135.99x for MicroStrategy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paylocity Holding has a net margin of 6.67% compared to CommVault Systems's net margin of 10.87%. CommVault Systems's return on equity of 74.28% beat Paylocity Holding's return on equity of 20.2%.

CommVault Systems has a consensus price target of $175.87, signalling upside risk potential of 14.21%. On the other hand Paylocity Holding has an analysts' consensus of $213.27 which suggests that it could grow by 11.41%. Given that CommVault Systems has higher upside potential than Paylocity Holding, analysts believe CommVault Systems is more attractive than Paylocity Holding.

CommVault Systems has a beta of 0.651, which suggesting that the stock is 34.928% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paylocity Holding has a beta of 0.933, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.732%.

CommVault Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paylocity Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CommVault Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paylocity Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CommVault Systems quarterly revenues are $233.3M, which are smaller than Paylocity Holding quarterly revenues of $317.6M. CommVault Systems's net income of $15.6M is lower than Paylocity Holding's net income of $34.5M. Notably, CommVault Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.98x while Paylocity Holding's PE ratio is 52.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CommVault Systems is 7.73x versus 7.77x for Paylocity Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.