CRCT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ePlus has a net margin of 6.84% compared to Cricut's net margin of 6.08%. Cricut's return on equity of 12.25% beat ePlus's return on equity of 12.01%.

Cricut has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -9.4%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 17.24%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than Cricut, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than Cricut.

Cricut has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.534%.

Cricut has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cricut pays 548.38% of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cricut quarterly revenues are $167.9M, which are smaller than ePlus quarterly revenues of $515.2M. Cricut's net income of $11.5M is lower than ePlus's net income of $31.3M. Notably, Cricut's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.86x while ePlus's PE ratio is 18.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cricut is 1.65x versus 0.96x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of 6.84% compared to Cricut's net margin of 9.02%. Cricut's return on equity of 12.25% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 5.77%.

Cricut has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -9.4%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of $25.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.81%. Given that Red Violet has higher upside potential than Cricut, analysts believe Red Violet is more attractive than Cricut.

Cricut has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.483, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.283%.

Cricut has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cricut pays 548.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cricut quarterly revenues are $167.9M, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $19.1M. Cricut's net income of $11.5M is higher than Red Violet's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Cricut's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.86x while Red Violet's PE ratio is 94.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cricut is 1.65x versus 6.83x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sonos has a net margin of 6.84% compared to Cricut's net margin of -20.79%. Cricut's return on equity of 12.25% beat Sonos's return on equity of -7.63%.

Cricut has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -9.4%. On the other hand Sonos has an analysts' consensus of $15.80 which suggests that it could grow by 8.82%. Given that Sonos has higher upside potential than Cricut, analysts believe Sonos is more attractive than Cricut.

Cricut has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sonos has a beta of 1.990, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.991%.

Cricut has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. Sonos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cricut pays 548.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Sonos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cricut quarterly revenues are $167.9M, which are smaller than Sonos quarterly revenues of $255.4M. Cricut's net income of $11.5M is higher than Sonos's net income of -$53.1M. Notably, Cricut's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.86x while Sonos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cricut is 1.65x versus 1.19x for Sonos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of 6.84% compared to Cricut's net margin of -2.6%. Cricut's return on equity of 12.25% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -69.75%.

Cricut has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -9.4%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -27.11%. Given that Upland Software has more downside risk than Cricut, analysts believe Cricut is more attractive than Upland Software.

Cricut has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.538%.

Cricut has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cricut pays 548.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cricut quarterly revenues are $167.9M, which are larger than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $66.7M. Cricut's net income of $11.5M is higher than Upland Software's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Cricut's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.86x while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cricut is 1.65x versus 0.43x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.