COLM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of 9.68% compared to Columbia Sportswear's net margin of -8.63%. Columbia Sportswear's return on equity of 11.44% beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of -8.22%.

Columbia Sportswear has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -6.57%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 37.18%. Given that Bassett Furniture Industries has higher upside potential than Columbia Sportswear, analysts believe Bassett Furniture Industries is more attractive than Columbia Sportswear.

Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.937, which suggesting that the stock is 6.296% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.687, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.726%.

Columbia Sportswear has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.36%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 5.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Columbia Sportswear pays 29.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -188.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Columbia Sportswear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Columbia Sportswear quarterly revenues are $931.8M, which are larger than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $83.4M. Columbia Sportswear's net income of $90.2M is higher than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of -$7.2M. Notably, Columbia Sportswear's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.39x while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Sportswear is 1.57x versus 0.36x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a net margin of 9.68% compared to Columbia Sportswear's net margin of 5.54%. Columbia Sportswear's return on equity of 11.44% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of 20.22%.

Columbia Sportswear has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -6.57%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 244.29%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than Columbia Sportswear, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than Columbia Sportswear.

Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.937, which suggesting that the stock is 6.296% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 2.391, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.083%.

Columbia Sportswear has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.36%. Commercial Vehicle Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Columbia Sportswear pays 29.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Columbia Sportswear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Columbia Sportswear quarterly revenues are $931.8M, which are larger than Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues of $171.8M. Columbia Sportswear's net income of $90.2M is higher than Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of $9.5M. Notably, Columbia Sportswear's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.39x while Commercial Vehicle Group's PE ratio is 2.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Sportswear is 1.57x versus 0.07x for Commercial Vehicle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 9.68% compared to Columbia Sportswear's net margin of --. Columbia Sportswear's return on equity of 11.44% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Columbia Sportswear has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -6.57%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -26.74%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has more downside risk than Columbia Sportswear, analysts believe Columbia Sportswear is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.937, which suggesting that the stock is 6.296% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.489%.

Columbia Sportswear has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.36%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Columbia Sportswear pays 29.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Columbia Sportswear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Columbia Sportswear quarterly revenues are $931.8M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Columbia Sportswear's net income of $90.2M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Columbia Sportswear's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.39x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Sportswear is 1.57x versus 273.78x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of 9.68% compared to Columbia Sportswear's net margin of --. Columbia Sportswear's return on equity of 11.44% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

Columbia Sportswear has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -6.57%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbia Sportswear has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Columbia Sportswear is more attractive than Northann.

Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.937, which suggesting that the stock is 6.296% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Columbia Sportswear has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.36%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Columbia Sportswear pays 29.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Columbia Sportswear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Columbia Sportswear quarterly revenues are $931.8M, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. Columbia Sportswear's net income of $90.2M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, Columbia Sportswear's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.39x while Northann's PE ratio is 37.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Sportswear is 1.57x versus 0.47x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.