COLM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Northann has a net margin of 9.35% compared to Columbia Sportswear's net margin of --. Columbia Sportswear's return on equity of 12.08% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

Columbia Sportswear has a consensus price target of $74.71, signalling upside risk potential of 10.61%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbia Sportswear has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Columbia Sportswear is more attractive than Northann.

Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.914, which suggesting that the stock is 8.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Columbia Sportswear has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.78%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Columbia Sportswear pays 31.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Columbia Sportswear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Columbia Sportswear quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. Columbia Sportswear's net income of $102.6M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, Columbia Sportswear's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.45x while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Sportswear is 1.17x versus 0.39x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ralph Lauren has a net margin of 9.35% compared to Columbia Sportswear's net margin of 13.88%. Columbia Sportswear's return on equity of 12.08% beat Ralph Lauren's return on equity of 28.48%.

Columbia Sportswear has a consensus price target of $74.71, signalling upside risk potential of 10.61%. On the other hand Ralph Lauren has an analysts' consensus of $281.25 which suggests that it could grow by 39.4%. Given that Ralph Lauren has higher upside potential than Columbia Sportswear, analysts believe Ralph Lauren is more attractive than Columbia Sportswear.

Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.914, which suggesting that the stock is 8.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.378, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.826%.

Columbia Sportswear has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.78%. Ralph Lauren offers a yield of 1.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Columbia Sportswear pays 31.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren pays out 30.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Columbia Sportswear quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Ralph Lauren quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Columbia Sportswear's net income of $102.6M is lower than Ralph Lauren's net income of $297.4M. Notably, Columbia Sportswear's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.45x while Ralph Lauren's PE ratio is 18.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Sportswear is 1.17x versus 1.87x for Ralph Lauren. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Under Armour has a net margin of 9.35% compared to Columbia Sportswear's net margin of 0.09%. Columbia Sportswear's return on equity of 12.08% beat Under Armour's return on equity of -6.29%.

Columbia Sportswear has a consensus price target of $74.71, signalling upside risk potential of 10.61%. On the other hand Under Armour has an analysts' consensus of $8.90 which suggests that it could grow by 63.51%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Columbia Sportswear, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Columbia Sportswear.

Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.914, which suggesting that the stock is 8.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Under Armour has a beta of 1.494, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.386%.

Columbia Sportswear has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.78%. Under Armour offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Columbia Sportswear pays 31.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Under Armour pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Columbia Sportswear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Columbia Sportswear quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Under Armour quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Columbia Sportswear's net income of $102.6M is higher than Under Armour's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Columbia Sportswear's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.45x while Under Armour's PE ratio is 12.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Sportswear is 1.17x versus 0.45x for Under Armour. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VF has a net margin of 9.35% compared to Columbia Sportswear's net margin of 5.92%. Columbia Sportswear's return on equity of 12.08% beat VF's return on equity of -27.74%.

Columbia Sportswear has a consensus price target of $74.71, signalling upside risk potential of 10.61%. On the other hand VF has an analysts' consensus of $23.02 which suggests that it could grow by 104.24%. Given that VF has higher upside potential than Columbia Sportswear, analysts believe VF is more attractive than Columbia Sportswear.

Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.914, which suggesting that the stock is 8.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VF has a beta of 1.571, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.125%.

Columbia Sportswear has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.78%. VF offers a yield of 3.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Columbia Sportswear pays 31.23% of its earnings as a dividend. VF pays out -31.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Columbia Sportswear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Columbia Sportswear quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than VF quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Columbia Sportswear's net income of $102.6M is lower than VF's net income of $167.8M. Notably, Columbia Sportswear's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.45x while VF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Sportswear is 1.17x versus 0.43x for VF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.