BLBD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Oshkosh has a net margin of 9.15% compared to Blue Bird's net margin of 5.89%. Blue Bird's return on equity of 82.17% beat Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.29%.

Blue Bird has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 60.95%. On the other hand Oshkosh has an analysts' consensus of $127.08 which suggests that it could grow by 34.75%. Given that Blue Bird has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe Blue Bird is more attractive than Oshkosh.

Blue Bird has a beta of 1.577, which suggesting that the stock is 57.707% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oshkosh has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.053%.

Blue Bird has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oshkosh offers a yield of 2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Blue Bird pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh pays out 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Blue Bird quarterly revenues are $313.9M, which are smaller than Oshkosh quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Blue Bird's net income of $28.7M is lower than Oshkosh's net income of $153.1M. Notably, Blue Bird's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.20x while Oshkosh's PE ratio is 9.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Bird is 0.82x versus 0.58x for Oshkosh. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PACCAR has a net margin of 9.15% compared to Blue Bird's net margin of 11.03%. Blue Bird's return on equity of 82.17% beat PACCAR's return on equity of 24.02%.

Blue Bird has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 60.95%. On the other hand PACCAR has an analysts' consensus of $113.22 which suggests that it could grow by 16.83%. Given that Blue Bird has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Blue Bird is more attractive than PACCAR.

Blue Bird has a beta of 1.577, which suggesting that the stock is 57.707% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PACCAR has a beta of 0.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.71%.

Blue Bird has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PACCAR offers a yield of 1.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Blue Bird pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR pays out 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Blue Bird quarterly revenues are $313.9M, which are smaller than PACCAR quarterly revenues of $7.9B. Blue Bird's net income of $28.7M is lower than PACCAR's net income of $872M. Notably, Blue Bird's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.20x while PACCAR's PE ratio is 12.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Bird is 0.82x versus 1.52x for PACCAR. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Shyft Group has a net margin of 9.15% compared to Blue Bird's net margin of -1.69%. Blue Bird's return on equity of 82.17% beat The Shyft Group's return on equity of -1.12%.

Blue Bird has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 60.95%. On the other hand The Shyft Group has an analysts' consensus of $15.50 which suggests that it could grow by 85.63%. Given that The Shyft Group has higher upside potential than Blue Bird, analysts believe The Shyft Group is more attractive than Blue Bird.

Blue Bird has a beta of 1.577, which suggesting that the stock is 57.707% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Shyft Group has a beta of 1.690, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.01%.

Blue Bird has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Shyft Group offers a yield of 2.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Blue Bird pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Shyft Group pays out -249.59% of its earnings as a dividend.

Blue Bird quarterly revenues are $313.9M, which are larger than The Shyft Group quarterly revenues of $201.4M. Blue Bird's net income of $28.7M is higher than The Shyft Group's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Blue Bird's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.20x while The Shyft Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Bird is 0.82x versus 0.37x for The Shyft Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wabash National has a net margin of 9.15% compared to Blue Bird's net margin of -0.25%. Blue Bird's return on equity of 82.17% beat Wabash National's return on equity of -69.69%.

Blue Bird has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 60.95%. On the other hand Wabash National has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 52.33%. Given that Blue Bird has higher upside potential than Wabash National, analysts believe Blue Bird is more attractive than Wabash National.

Blue Bird has a beta of 1.577, which suggesting that the stock is 57.707% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wabash National has a beta of 1.641, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.094%.

Blue Bird has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wabash National offers a yield of 3.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Blue Bird pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wabash National pays out -5.2% of its earnings as a dividend.

Blue Bird quarterly revenues are $313.9M, which are smaller than Wabash National quarterly revenues of $416.8M. Blue Bird's net income of $28.7M is higher than Wabash National's net income of -$1M. Notably, Blue Bird's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.20x while Wabash National's PE ratio is 5.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Bird is 0.82x versus 0.26x for Wabash National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.