BASE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Castellum has a net margin of -35.16% compared to Couchbase's net margin of -11.03%. Couchbase's return on equity of -62.06% beat Castellum's return on equity of -74.03%.

Couchbase has a consensus price target of $25.57, signalling upside risk potential of 50.16%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 91.83%. Given that Castellum has higher upside potential than Couchbase, analysts believe Castellum is more attractive than Couchbase.

Couchbase has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -0.960, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 195.959%.

Couchbase has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Couchbase pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -0.66% of its earnings as a dividend.

Couchbase quarterly revenues are $51.6M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $11.6M. Couchbase's net income of -$18.2M is lower than Castellum's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Couchbase's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Couchbase is 3.79x versus 0.72x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a net margin of -35.16% compared to Couchbase's net margin of 16.6%. Couchbase's return on equity of -62.06% beat DigitalOcean Holdings's return on equity of --.

Couchbase has a consensus price target of $25.57, signalling upside risk potential of 50.16%. On the other hand DigitalOcean Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $40.73 which suggests that it could grow by 14.08%. Given that Couchbase has higher upside potential than DigitalOcean Holdings, analysts believe Couchbase is more attractive than DigitalOcean Holdings.

Couchbase has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DigitalOcean Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Couchbase has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DigitalOcean Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Couchbase pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DigitalOcean Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Couchbase quarterly revenues are $51.6M, which are smaller than DigitalOcean Holdings quarterly revenues of $198.5M. Couchbase's net income of -$18.2M is lower than DigitalOcean Holdings's net income of $32.9M. Notably, Couchbase's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DigitalOcean Holdings's PE ratio is 42.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Couchbase is 3.79x versus 4.51x for DigitalOcean Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dynatrace has a net margin of -35.16% compared to Couchbase's net margin of 10.53%. Couchbase's return on equity of -62.06% beat Dynatrace's return on equity of 8.21%.

Couchbase has a consensus price target of $25.57, signalling upside risk potential of 50.16%. On the other hand Dynatrace has an analysts' consensus of $62.11 which suggests that it could grow by 13.67%. Given that Couchbase has higher upside potential than Dynatrace, analysts believe Couchbase is more attractive than Dynatrace.

Couchbase has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dynatrace has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.124%.

Couchbase has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dynatrace offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Couchbase pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dynatrace pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Couchbase quarterly revenues are $51.6M, which are smaller than Dynatrace quarterly revenues of $418.1M. Couchbase's net income of -$18.2M is lower than Dynatrace's net income of $44M. Notably, Couchbase's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dynatrace's PE ratio is 99.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Couchbase is 3.79x versus 10.52x for Dynatrace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MongoDB has a net margin of -35.16% compared to Couchbase's net margin of -1.85%. Couchbase's return on equity of -62.06% beat MongoDB's return on equity of -16.23%.

Couchbase has a consensus price target of $25.57, signalling upside risk potential of 50.16%. On the other hand MongoDB has an analysts' consensus of $379.30 which suggests that it could grow by 54.42%. Given that MongoDB has higher upside potential than Couchbase, analysts believe MongoDB is more attractive than Couchbase.

Couchbase has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MongoDB has a beta of 1.170, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.953%.

Couchbase has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MongoDB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Couchbase pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MongoDB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Couchbase quarterly revenues are $51.6M, which are smaller than MongoDB quarterly revenues of $529.4M. Couchbase's net income of -$18.2M is lower than MongoDB's net income of -$9.8M. Notably, Couchbase's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MongoDB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Couchbase is 3.79x versus 9.40x for MongoDB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.