How High Will Airbnb Stock Go?
Airbnb, Inc. (NASDAQ:ABNB) share price has seen substantial turbulence over…
Sell
3
AUMI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$34.62
Seasonality move
:
1.58%
Day range:
$34.75 - $34.75
52-week range:
$23.50 - $41.92
Dividend yield:
1.87%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
134
Avg. volume:
2.3K
1-year change:
22.28%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUMI
Themes Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AGMI
Themes Silver Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRIT
Optica Rare Earths & Critical Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUMI
Themes Gold Miners ETF
|
$34.62 | -- | -- | -- | $0.65 | 1.87% | -- |
|
AGMI
Themes Silver Miners ETF
|
$26.93 | -- | -- | -- | $0.44 | 1.65% | -- |
|
CRIT
Optica Rare Earths & Critical Materials ETF
|
$16.53 | -- | -- | -- | $0.51 | 3.09% | -- |
|
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
|
$34.41 | -- | -- | -- | $0.40 | 1.17% | -- |
|
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
|
$43.27 | -- | -- | -- | $1.11 | 2.58% | -- |
|
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
|
$28.48 | -- | -- | -- | $0.22 | 1.41% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUMI
Themes Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
AGMI
Themes Silver Miners ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
CRIT
Optica Rare Earths & Critical Materials ETF
|
-- | 0.725 | -- | -- |
|
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -0.219 | -- | -- |
|
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -0.338 | -- | -- |
|
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -0.111 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUMI
Themes Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AGMI
Themes Silver Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRIT
Optica Rare Earths & Critical Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Themes Gold Miners ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AUMI or AGMI?
Themes Silver Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Gold Miners ETF's net margin of --. Themes Gold Miners ETF's return on equity of -- beat Themes Silver Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUMIThemes Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- AGMIThemes Silver Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AUMI or AGMI?
Themes Gold Miners ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Themes Silver Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Gold Miners ETF has higher upside potential than Themes Silver Miners ETF, analysts believe Themes Gold Miners ETF is more attractive than Themes Silver Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUMIThemes Gold Miners ETF0 0 0 AGMIThemes Silver Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is AUMI or AGMI More Risky?
Themes Gold Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Themes Silver Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMI or AGMI?
Themes Gold Miners ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. Themes Silver Miners ETF offers a yield of 1.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Themes Gold Miners ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Themes Silver Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMI or AGMI?
Themes Gold Miners ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Themes Silver Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Themes Gold Miners ETF's net income of -- is lower than Themes Silver Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Themes Gold Miners ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Themes Silver Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Gold Miners ETF is -- versus -- for Themes Silver Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUMIThemes Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- -- AGMIThemes Silver Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AUMI or CRIT?
Optica Rare Earths & Critical Materials ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Gold Miners ETF's net margin of --. Themes Gold Miners ETF's return on equity of -- beat Optica Rare Earths & Critical Materials ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUMIThemes Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- CRITOptica Rare Earths & Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AUMI or CRIT?
Themes Gold Miners ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Optica Rare Earths & Critical Materials ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Gold Miners ETF has higher upside potential than Optica Rare Earths & Critical Materials ETF, analysts believe Themes Gold Miners ETF is more attractive than Optica Rare Earths & Critical Materials ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUMIThemes Gold Miners ETF0 0 0 CRITOptica Rare Earths & Critical Materials ETF0 0 0 -
Is AUMI or CRIT More Risky?
Themes Gold Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Optica Rare Earths & Critical Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMI or CRIT?
Themes Gold Miners ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. Optica Rare Earths & Critical Materials ETF offers a yield of 3.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Themes Gold Miners ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Optica Rare Earths & Critical Materials ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMI or CRIT?
Themes Gold Miners ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Optica Rare Earths & Critical Materials ETF quarterly revenues of --. Themes Gold Miners ETF's net income of -- is lower than Optica Rare Earths & Critical Materials ETF's net income of --. Notably, Themes Gold Miners ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Optica Rare Earths & Critical Materials ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Gold Miners ETF is -- versus -- for Optica Rare Earths & Critical Materials ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUMIThemes Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- -- CRITOptica Rare Earths & Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AUMI or GDX?
VanEck Gold Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Gold Miners ETF's net margin of --. Themes Gold Miners ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Gold Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUMIThemes Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- GDXVanEck Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AUMI or GDX?
Themes Gold Miners ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Gold Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Gold Miners ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Gold Miners ETF, analysts believe Themes Gold Miners ETF is more attractive than VanEck Gold Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUMIThemes Gold Miners ETF0 0 0 GDXVanEck Gold Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is AUMI or GDX More Risky?
Themes Gold Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Gold Miners ETF has a beta of 0.979, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.133%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMI or GDX?
Themes Gold Miners ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. VanEck Gold Miners ETF offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Themes Gold Miners ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Gold Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMI or GDX?
Themes Gold Miners ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Gold Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Themes Gold Miners ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Gold Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Themes Gold Miners ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Gold Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Gold Miners ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Gold Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUMIThemes Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- -- GDXVanEck Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AUMI or GDXJ?
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Gold Miners ETF's net margin of --. Themes Gold Miners ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUMIThemes Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- GDXJVanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AUMI or GDXJ?
Themes Gold Miners ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Gold Miners ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF, analysts believe Themes Gold Miners ETF is more attractive than VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUMIThemes Gold Miners ETF0 0 0 GDXJVanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is AUMI or GDXJ More Risky?
Themes Gold Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF has a beta of 1.295, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.466%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMI or GDXJ?
Themes Gold Miners ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF offers a yield of 2.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share. Themes Gold Miners ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMI or GDXJ?
Themes Gold Miners ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Themes Gold Miners ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Themes Gold Miners ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Gold Miners ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUMIThemes Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- -- GDXJVanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AUMI or RING?
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Gold Miners ETF's net margin of --. Themes Gold Miners ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUMIThemes Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- RINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AUMI or RING?
Themes Gold Miners ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Gold Miners ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF, analysts believe Themes Gold Miners ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUMIThemes Gold Miners ETF0 0 0 RINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is AUMI or RING More Risky?
Themes Gold Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF has a beta of 0.946, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.415%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMI or RING?
Themes Gold Miners ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Themes Gold Miners ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMI or RING?
Themes Gold Miners ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Themes Gold Miners ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Themes Gold Miners ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Gold Miners ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUMIThemes Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- -- RINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
60
QMCO alert for Dec 26
Quantum [QMCO] is up 49.62% over the past day.
Buy
64
ARQQ alert for Dec 27
Arqit Quantum [ARQQ] is up 49.85% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 26
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 3.73% over the past day.
