Financhill
Sell
34

AMSC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$18.28
Seasonality move :
2.69%
Day range:
$17.72 - $18.58
52-week range:
$11.36 - $38.02
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
230.00x
P/S ratio:
3.36x
P/B ratio:
3.77x
Volume:
483K
Avg. volume:
914.6K
1-year change:
36.4%
Market cap:
$726.1M
Revenue:
$145.6M
EPS (TTM):
$0.08

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
AMSC
American Superconductor
$60.3M $0.10 43.4% -83.33% $39.00
BE
Bloom Energy
$293.6M -$0.04 24.75% -82.22% $25.96
BLNK
Blink Charging
$27.6M -$0.12 -25.37% -30.41% $2.79
NDSN
Nordson
$639.4M $2.08 3.43% 15.06% $252.06
TAYD
Taylor Devices
-- -- -- -- --
TPIC
TPI Composites
$310.5M -$0.57 3.83% -56.41% $3.26
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
AMSC
American Superconductor
$18.40 $39.00 $726.1M 230.00x $0.00 0% 3.36x
BE
Bloom Energy
$21.24 $25.96 $4.9B -- $0.00 0% 3.28x
BLNK
Blink Charging
$0.94 $2.79 $95.2M -- $0.00 0% 0.76x
NDSN
Nordson
$200.95 $252.06 $11.4B 25.57x $0.78 1.5% 4.33x
TAYD
Taylor Devices
$32.51 -- $102M 13.00x $0.00 0% 2.48x
TPIC
TPI Composites
$0.79 $3.26 $37.8M -- $0.00 0% 0.03x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
AMSC
American Superconductor
-- 5.533 -- 1.14x
BE
Bloom Energy
66.74% 8.839 22.08% 2.03x
BLNK
Blink Charging
0.14% 0.350 -- 1.78x
NDSN
Nordson
43.18% 1.001 17.39% 1.37x
TAYD
Taylor Devices
-- 0.231 -- 3.68x
TPIC
TPI Composites
253.36% 1.907 685.26% 0.83x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
AMSC
American Superconductor
$16.3M $1.3M 2.17% 2.17% 2.14% $5.4M
BE
Bloom Energy
$219.3M $104.7M -1.93% -5.85% 21.23% $473.1M
BLNK
Blink Charging
$7.4M -$15.6M -73.85% -56.43% -51.9% -$10.1M
NDSN
Nordson
$335.9M $140.9M 9.74% 15.96% 23.3% $137.7M
TAYD
Taylor Devices
$4.5M $2M 15.37% 15.37% 19.12% $8.8M
TPIC
TPI Composites
-$3.7M -$8.9M -80.46% -248.14% -5.51% $83.2M

American Superconductor vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns AMSC or BE?

    Bloom Energy has a net margin of 4.02% compared to American Superconductor's net margin of 18.31%. American Superconductor's return on equity of 2.17% beat Bloom Energy's return on equity of -5.85%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AMSC
    American Superconductor
    26.59% $0.06 $192.7M
    BE
    Bloom Energy
    38.32% $0.38 $1.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About AMSC or BE?

    American Superconductor has a consensus price target of $39.00, signalling upside risk potential of 111.96%. On the other hand Bloom Energy has an analysts' consensus of $25.96 which suggests that it could grow by 22.2%. Given that American Superconductor has higher upside potential than Bloom Energy, analysts believe American Superconductor is more attractive than Bloom Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AMSC
    American Superconductor
    2 0 0
    BE
    Bloom Energy
    8 13 0
  • Is AMSC or BE More Risky?

    American Superconductor has a beta of 2.577, which suggesting that the stock is 157.668% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bloom Energy has a beta of 3.274, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 227.426%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMSC or BE?

    American Superconductor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bloom Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Superconductor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bloom Energy pays out -5.02% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AMSC or BE?

    American Superconductor quarterly revenues are $61.4M, which are smaller than Bloom Energy quarterly revenues of $572.4M. American Superconductor's net income of $2.5M is lower than Bloom Energy's net income of $104.8M. Notably, American Superconductor's price-to-earnings ratio is 230.00x while Bloom Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Superconductor is 3.36x versus 3.28x for Bloom Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AMSC
    American Superconductor
    3.36x 230.00x $61.4M $2.5M
    BE
    Bloom Energy
    3.28x -- $572.4M $104.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns AMSC or BLNK?

    Blink Charging has a net margin of 4.02% compared to American Superconductor's net margin of -244.28%. American Superconductor's return on equity of 2.17% beat Blink Charging's return on equity of -56.43%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AMSC
    American Superconductor
    26.59% $0.06 $192.7M
    BLNK
    Blink Charging
    24.73% -$0.73 $194.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About AMSC or BLNK?

    American Superconductor has a consensus price target of $39.00, signalling upside risk potential of 111.96%. On the other hand Blink Charging has an analysts' consensus of $2.79 which suggests that it could grow by 195.94%. Given that Blink Charging has higher upside potential than American Superconductor, analysts believe Blink Charging is more attractive than American Superconductor.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AMSC
    American Superconductor
    2 0 0
    BLNK
    Blink Charging
    1 5 0
  • Is AMSC or BLNK More Risky?

    American Superconductor has a beta of 2.577, which suggesting that the stock is 157.668% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blink Charging has a beta of 2.940, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 193.966%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMSC or BLNK?

    American Superconductor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Blink Charging offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Superconductor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Blink Charging pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AMSC or BLNK?

    American Superconductor quarterly revenues are $61.4M, which are larger than Blink Charging quarterly revenues of $30.1M. American Superconductor's net income of $2.5M is higher than Blink Charging's net income of -$73.5M. Notably, American Superconductor's price-to-earnings ratio is 230.00x while Blink Charging's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Superconductor is 3.36x versus 0.76x for Blink Charging. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AMSC
    American Superconductor
    3.36x 230.00x $61.4M $2.5M
    BLNK
    Blink Charging
    0.76x -- $30.1M -$73.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns AMSC or NDSN?

    Nordson has a net margin of 4.02% compared to American Superconductor's net margin of 15.38%. American Superconductor's return on equity of 2.17% beat Nordson's return on equity of 15.96%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AMSC
    American Superconductor
    26.59% $0.06 $192.7M
    NDSN
    Nordson
    54.58% $1.65 $5.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About AMSC or NDSN?

    American Superconductor has a consensus price target of $39.00, signalling upside risk potential of 111.96%. On the other hand Nordson has an analysts' consensus of $252.06 which suggests that it could grow by 25.44%. Given that American Superconductor has higher upside potential than Nordson, analysts believe American Superconductor is more attractive than Nordson.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AMSC
    American Superconductor
    2 0 0
    NDSN
    Nordson
    4 4 0
  • Is AMSC or NDSN More Risky?

    American Superconductor has a beta of 2.577, which suggesting that the stock is 157.668% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordson has a beta of 0.960, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.982%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMSC or NDSN?

    American Superconductor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nordson offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. American Superconductor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nordson pays out 34.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AMSC or NDSN?

    American Superconductor quarterly revenues are $61.4M, which are smaller than Nordson quarterly revenues of $615.4M. American Superconductor's net income of $2.5M is lower than Nordson's net income of $94.7M. Notably, American Superconductor's price-to-earnings ratio is 230.00x while Nordson's PE ratio is 25.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Superconductor is 3.36x versus 4.33x for Nordson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AMSC
    American Superconductor
    3.36x 230.00x $61.4M $2.5M
    NDSN
    Nordson
    4.33x 25.57x $615.4M $94.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns AMSC or TAYD?

    Taylor Devices has a net margin of 4.02% compared to American Superconductor's net margin of 18.95%. American Superconductor's return on equity of 2.17% beat Taylor Devices's return on equity of 15.37%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AMSC
    American Superconductor
    26.59% $0.06 $192.7M
    TAYD
    Taylor Devices
    42.87% $0.64 $57.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About AMSC or TAYD?

    American Superconductor has a consensus price target of $39.00, signalling upside risk potential of 111.96%. On the other hand Taylor Devices has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that American Superconductor has higher upside potential than Taylor Devices, analysts believe American Superconductor is more attractive than Taylor Devices.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AMSC
    American Superconductor
    2 0 0
    TAYD
    Taylor Devices
    0 0 0
  • Is AMSC or TAYD More Risky?

    American Superconductor has a beta of 2.577, which suggesting that the stock is 157.668% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Taylor Devices has a beta of 0.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.663%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMSC or TAYD?

    American Superconductor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Taylor Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Superconductor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Taylor Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AMSC or TAYD?

    American Superconductor quarterly revenues are $61.4M, which are larger than Taylor Devices quarterly revenues of $10.6M. American Superconductor's net income of $2.5M is higher than Taylor Devices's net income of $2M. Notably, American Superconductor's price-to-earnings ratio is 230.00x while Taylor Devices's PE ratio is 13.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Superconductor is 3.36x versus 2.48x for Taylor Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AMSC
    American Superconductor
    3.36x 230.00x $61.4M $2.5M
    TAYD
    Taylor Devices
    2.48x 13.00x $10.6M $2M
  • Which has Higher Returns AMSC or TPIC?

    TPI Composites has a net margin of 4.02% compared to American Superconductor's net margin of -13.88%. American Superconductor's return on equity of 2.17% beat TPI Composites's return on equity of -248.14%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AMSC
    American Superconductor
    26.59% $0.06 $192.7M
    TPIC
    TPI Composites
    -1.06% -$1.01 $243.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About AMSC or TPIC?

    American Superconductor has a consensus price target of $39.00, signalling upside risk potential of 111.96%. On the other hand TPI Composites has an analysts' consensus of $3.26 which suggests that it could grow by 310.22%. Given that TPI Composites has higher upside potential than American Superconductor, analysts believe TPI Composites is more attractive than American Superconductor.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AMSC
    American Superconductor
    2 0 0
    TPIC
    TPI Composites
    3 6 2
  • Is AMSC or TPIC More Risky?

    American Superconductor has a beta of 2.577, which suggesting that the stock is 157.668% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TPI Composites has a beta of 2.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.556%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMSC or TPIC?

    American Superconductor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TPI Composites offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Superconductor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TPI Composites pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AMSC or TPIC?

    American Superconductor quarterly revenues are $61.4M, which are smaller than TPI Composites quarterly revenues of $346.5M. American Superconductor's net income of $2.5M is higher than TPI Composites's net income of -$48.1M. Notably, American Superconductor's price-to-earnings ratio is 230.00x while TPI Composites's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Superconductor is 3.36x versus 0.03x for TPI Composites. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AMSC
    American Superconductor
    3.36x 230.00x $61.4M $2.5M
    TPIC
    TPI Composites
    0.03x -- $346.5M -$48.1M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Where Will Nu Holdings Stock Be in 2030?
Where Will Nu Holdings Stock Be in 2030?

Despite fast growth, high profitability and an extraordinary runway ahead,…

Is it Too Late to Buy United Airlines Stock?
Is it Too Late to Buy United Airlines Stock?

United Airlines (NASDAQ:UAL) has thoroughly outpaced the broader stock market…

3 Smartest Dividend Stocks to Buy Now
3 Smartest Dividend Stocks to Buy Now

When the market entered a correction in February and March,…

Stock Ideas

Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 32x

Sell
42
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Alerts

Buy
78
GATE alert for Apr 2

Marblegate Acquisition [GATE] is up 86.64% over the past day.

Buy
52
NUTX alert for Apr 2

Nutex Health [NUTX] is down 1.33% over the past day.

Buy
75
CORT alert for Apr 2

Corcept Therapeutics [CORT] is down 6.18% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock