ALOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GoPro has a net margin of -41.75% compared to AstroNova's net margin of -18.51%. AstroNova's return on equity of -16.42% beat GoPro's return on equity of -166.14%.

AstroNova has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 179.87%. On the other hand GoPro has an analysts' consensus of $0.65 which suggests that it could grow by 24.21%. Given that AstroNova has higher upside potential than GoPro, analysts believe AstroNova is more attractive than GoPro.

AstroNova has a beta of 0.486, which suggesting that the stock is 51.37% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GoPro has a beta of 1.539, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.856%.

AstroNova has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GoPro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AstroNova pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GoPro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AstroNova quarterly revenues are $37.4M, which are smaller than GoPro quarterly revenues of $200.9M. AstroNova's net income of -$15.6M is higher than GoPro's net income of -$37.2M. Notably, AstroNova's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.46x while GoPro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AstroNova is 0.40x versus 0.10x for GoPro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Immersion has a net margin of -41.75% compared to AstroNova's net margin of 3.26%. AstroNova's return on equity of -16.42% beat Immersion's return on equity of 24.27%.

AstroNova has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 179.87%. On the other hand Immersion has an analysts' consensus of $12.25 which suggests that it could grow by 68.04%. Given that AstroNova has higher upside potential than Immersion, analysts believe AstroNova is more attractive than Immersion.

AstroNova has a beta of 0.486, which suggesting that the stock is 51.37% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Immersion has a beta of 1.496, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.639%.

AstroNova has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Immersion offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. AstroNova pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Immersion pays out 16.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Immersion's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AstroNova quarterly revenues are $37.4M, which are smaller than Immersion quarterly revenues of $474.8M. AstroNova's net income of -$15.6M is lower than Immersion's net income of $15.5M. Notably, AstroNova's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.46x while Immersion's PE ratio is 2.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AstroNova is 0.40x versus 0.19x for Immersion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Juniper Networks has a net margin of -41.75% compared to AstroNova's net margin of 11.54%. AstroNova's return on equity of -16.42% beat Juniper Networks's return on equity of 6.29%.

AstroNova has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 179.87%. On the other hand Juniper Networks has an analysts' consensus of $39.89 which suggests that it could grow by 15.65%. Given that AstroNova has higher upside potential than Juniper Networks, analysts believe AstroNova is more attractive than Juniper Networks.

AstroNova has a beta of 0.486, which suggesting that the stock is 51.37% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Juniper Networks has a beta of 0.841, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.886%.

AstroNova has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Juniper Networks offers a yield of 2.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. AstroNova pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Juniper Networks pays out 100.24% of its earnings as a dividend.

AstroNova quarterly revenues are $37.4M, which are smaller than Juniper Networks quarterly revenues of $1.4B. AstroNova's net income of -$15.6M is lower than Juniper Networks's net income of $162M. Notably, AstroNova's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.46x while Juniper Networks's PE ratio is 40.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AstroNova is 0.40x versus 2.26x for Juniper Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Transact Technologies has a net margin of -41.75% compared to AstroNova's net margin of -77.77%. AstroNova's return on equity of -16.42% beat Transact Technologies's return on equity of -26.59%.

AstroNova has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 179.87%. On the other hand Transact Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $6.75 which suggests that it could grow by 95.09%. Given that AstroNova has higher upside potential than Transact Technologies, analysts believe AstroNova is more attractive than Transact Technologies.

AstroNova has a beta of 0.486, which suggesting that the stock is 51.37% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Transact Technologies has a beta of 1.337, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.657%.

AstroNova has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Transact Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AstroNova pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Transact Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AstroNova quarterly revenues are $37.4M, which are larger than Transact Technologies quarterly revenues of $10.2M. AstroNova's net income of -$15.6M is lower than Transact Technologies's net income of -$8M. Notably, AstroNova's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.46x while Transact Technologies's PE ratio is 87.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AstroNova is 0.40x versus 0.80x for Transact Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.