AEYE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Inuvo has a net margin of -13.47% compared to AudioEye's net margin of -9.14%. AudioEye's return on equity of -52.21% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

AudioEye has a consensus price target of $32.70, signalling upside risk potential of 117.57%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 70.25%. Given that AudioEye has higher upside potential than Inuvo, analysts believe AudioEye is more attractive than Inuvo.

AudioEye has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 11.986% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.937, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.269%.

AudioEye has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AudioEye pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AudioEye quarterly revenues are $8.9M, which are smaller than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. AudioEye's net income of -$1.2M is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, AudioEye's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioEye is 5.32x versus 0.99x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Issuer Direct has a net margin of -13.47% compared to AudioEye's net margin of -6.7%. AudioEye's return on equity of -52.21% beat Issuer Direct's return on equity of -3.74%.

AudioEye has a consensus price target of $32.70, signalling upside risk potential of 117.57%. On the other hand Issuer Direct has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 56.44%. Given that AudioEye has higher upside potential than Issuer Direct, analysts believe AudioEye is more attractive than Issuer Direct.

AudioEye has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 11.986% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Issuer Direct has a beta of 0.769, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.119%.

AudioEye has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Issuer Direct offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AudioEye pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Issuer Direct pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AudioEye quarterly revenues are $8.9M, which are larger than Issuer Direct quarterly revenues of $7M. AudioEye's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Issuer Direct's net income of -$466K. Notably, AudioEye's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Issuer Direct's PE ratio is 59.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioEye is 5.32x versus 1.09x for Issuer Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of -13.47% compared to AudioEye's net margin of 37.61%. AudioEye's return on equity of -52.21% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 35.68%.

AudioEye has a consensus price target of $32.70, signalling upside risk potential of 117.57%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $508.46 which suggests that it could grow by 21.37%. Given that AudioEye has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe AudioEye is more attractive than Microsoft.

AudioEye has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 11.986% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.896, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.413%.

AudioEye has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. AudioEye pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AudioEye quarterly revenues are $8.9M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $65.6B. AudioEye's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.7B. Notably, AudioEye's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 34.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioEye is 5.32x versus 12.31x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Synopsys has a net margin of -13.47% compared to AudioEye's net margin of 68.1%. AudioEye's return on equity of -52.21% beat Synopsys's return on equity of 30.71%.

AudioEye has a consensus price target of $32.70, signalling upside risk potential of 117.57%. On the other hand Synopsys has an analysts' consensus of $634.37 which suggests that it could grow by 28.8%. Given that AudioEye has higher upside potential than Synopsys, analysts believe AudioEye is more attractive than Synopsys.

AudioEye has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 11.986% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Synopsys has a beta of 1.115, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.535%.

AudioEye has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Synopsys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AudioEye pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Synopsys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AudioEye quarterly revenues are $8.9M, which are smaller than Synopsys quarterly revenues of $1.6B. AudioEye's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Synopsys's net income of $1.1B. Notably, AudioEye's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Synopsys's PE ratio is 33.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioEye is 5.32x versus 12.25x for Synopsys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.